TraditionalLSATInfallibilityApologetics: lips go here 8====D Forum

[imjustjoking22]

interesting. I was hoping it was the 1st LR but in all reality I found them all to be equal. Glad I didn't assume it was 1 of the first 2 and let that creep in mentally. I went into the test thinking that the lsac would do whatever the hell they want and I was right.

Found them all equal? Really? I don't think I had more than 5 min left to check tough answers on the first 2 LR sections, and I wouldn't be surprised if I had a full 15 left on the last one...double-checked every one of those suckers. I thought that would be the saving grace of this test for me...wah.

[powellshake2]

Well I'm now convinced that it's true- the experimental section can now appear 4th, or possibly later. Someone from another thread had a the experimental RC in his 4th section. That's pretty hard to argue with, unless of course he's lying. Thank you all, and good night.

I may be missing the point entirely, but I 100% had those previously mentioned LR questions and I had two RC sections. So what the hell does that mean?

I would not assume that the LR section with the pizza parlor question and cops/computers is experimental. It couldn't have been for me.

(Sorry if i'm missing the point/mistaken)

[zdamico]

I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous

[benito]

I'm one of the traditional LSAT infallibity apologetics this thread is referring to and I'm starting to loosen my skepticism. Does anyone that only had one RC section remember any subjects??

[benito]

Well I'm now convinced that it's true- the experimental section can now appear 4th, or possibly later. Someone from another thread had a the experimental RC in his 4th section. That's pretty hard to argue with, unless of course he's lying. Thank you all, and good night.

I may be missing the point entirely, but I 100% had those previously mentioned LR questions and I had two RC sections. So what the hell does that mean?

I would not assume that the LR section with the pizza parlor question and cops/computers is experimental. It couldn't have been for me.

(Sorry if i'm missing the point/mistaken)

I dont think you're mistaken at all, I think this test is just a blur and people's memories are faulty. You're right that if you had two RC sections all of your LR questions are real.

[qbt1990]

I'm one of the traditional LSAT infallibity apologetics this thread is referring to and I'm starting to loosen my skepticism. Does anyone that only had one RC section remember any subjects??

The real RC section had Dostoyevsky, Mexican proverbs, etc

[qbt1990]

I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous

I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

[crumpetsandtea]

I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous

I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

On the dick, my friend. On the dick.

[lsatprepguy]

I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous

I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

On the dick, my friend. On the dick.

I am on the train, and I just laughed so hard that people got up and moved lolololool

[benito]

I'm one of the traditional LSAT infallibity apologetics this thread is referring to and I'm starting to loosen my skepticism. Does anyone that only had one RC section remember any subjects??

The real RC section had Dostoyevsky, Mexican proverbs, etc

great....thanks

[happyshapy]

Well I'm now convinced that it's true- the experimental section can now appear 4th, or possibly later. Someone from another thread had a the experimental RC in his 4th section. That's pretty hard to argue with, unless of course he's lying. Thank you all, and good night.

I may be missing the point entirely, but I 100% had those previously mentioned LR questions and I had two RC sections. So what the hell does that mean?

I would not assume that the LR section with the pizza parlor question and cops/computers is experimental. It couldn't have been for me.

(Sorry if i'm missing the point/mistaken)

i think you might be missing the point. ppl who had LR experimental fourth had the pizza and cops/computer questions in their second LR (3rd section overall). At least I did.

[3v3ryth1ng]

I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous

1) True. It's a "soft" confirmation from a typically reliable source.

2) I wear collared shirts with shiny shoes. I'm mature, ok? Besides, it feels really, really good to get bl... I mean, to be right

[qbt1990]

I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous

I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

On the dick, my friend. On the dick.

hahaha wow. yeah I agree, extremely distasteful :/

[3v3ryth1ng]

I'm one of those people who would love a 4th section experimental and believe its possible but..

A. Just because Blueprint said it doesn't mean it's true, and

B. Change the thread title, we aren't in high school. I understand some people were assholes about it being the 4th section, but that type of immaturity is just ridiculous

I don't even understand the title? where do lips go? i'm confused

On the dick, my friend. On the dick.

hahaha wow. yeah I agree, extremely distasteful :/

Man, did I commit another faux pas? How do I always find a way to alienate myself? Somehow I managed to do it before I had any friends this time.

[soj]

had high hopes after the title. disappointed.

pretty surprised the experimental could be 4th.

[3v3ryth1ng]

had high hopes after the title. disappointed.

pretty surprised the experimental could be 4th.

I think I broke some teeth with my cold, hard, phallus of truth. I think that, for some posters, it was their first time seeing it, so they got scared and went into hiding.

What were you expecting?

[soj]

more penis, less derp

chill out bro, you got a pretty big chip on your shoulders

[3v3ryth1ng]

more penis, less derp

chill out bro, you got a pretty big chip on your shoulders

What's derp? And yes, you're correct, and no it doesn't stop.
Enjoy your weekend everyone!

[rivermaker]

for people that say section 4 was experimental, what LR question numbers did you have. 25 26 25? or 25 26 26?

[3v3ryth1ng]

for people that say section 4 was experimental, what LR question numbers did you have. 25 26 25? or 25 26 26?

At this point, I don't even remember. People were comparing these on the day of the test. Flip to the beginning of all the recent post-LSAT threads and try to find people talking about the subjects. I think I remember one person actually compiled a list of subjects in one post. Some words you'd try searching for are "whales, pizza, apes, mirrors, alzheimers, hot spots" among others.