OCT 2011 Experimental Section

User avatar
LSAT Blog
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby LSAT Blog » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:12 pm

thejrob wrote:
zdamico wrote:
thejrob wrote:Is it possible that some people had

LR25, LG23, LR26, LR26, RC27

and others had

LR25, LG23, LR26, LR25, RC27

??


Yes, people did, meaning the LR sections HAVE to be 25 and 26.


wouldn't that mean that there were 2 different LR experimental sections? a 26 question and a 25 question one. Would they do that?


This is entirely possible. There's no reason they can't have multiple experimental sections of the same type. After all, LSAC has to test out a lot of LR questions for future exams!

poi
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:56 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby poi » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:17 pm

.
Last edited by poi on Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
941law
Posts: 425
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:21 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby 941law » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:21 pm

poi wrote:Anyone remember number of questions on d...vski RC passage?


19-27?

User avatar
Tim0thy222
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:57 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby Tim0thy222 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:22 pm

Did the real LG have ice expeditions and ocean expeditions?

If yes, see you at UVA.

If no, see you at Cooley.

User avatar
franklyscarlet
Posts: 2915
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby franklyscarlet » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:23 pm

Tim0thy222 wrote:Did the real LG have ice expeditions and ocean expeditions?

If yes, see you at UVA.

If no, see you at Cooley.


QFT

User avatar
zozin
Posts: 3733
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby zozin » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm

Tim0thy222 wrote:If no, see you at Cooley.


:( Mailman just dropped off some Cooley paraphernalia. If that's not a bad omen, I don't know what is.

Bstbll
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby Bstbll » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:28 pm

Guys, I spoke with my girlfriend, who was also taking the lsat today. She had the double lg test, I had a triple lr (1-3-4, 25-26-25). I specifically made sure I remembered a few questions from each lr section to ask her if she had them. When we compared, she remembered having questions from 1 and 3 for me, which makes me think the experimental was 4, even though that isn't supposed to happen. I'm absolutely positive the questions were from the right sections (I specifically checked each section to make sure), and she remembered the questions i was talking about before I even finished discussing them, so I dont see any other explanation. The lr experimental was number 4 if you had the same order as me.

EDIT: and no, the real lg didn't have ice expeditions. The real one had books, bikes, and ambassadors.

User avatar
szb5058
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:33 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby szb5058 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:35 pm

Bstbll wrote:Guys, I spoke with my girlfriend, who was also taking the lsat today. She had the double lg test, I had a triple lr (1-3-4, 25-26-25). I specifically made sure I remembered a few questions from each lr section to ask her if she had them. When we compared, she remembered having questions from 1 and 3 for me, which makes me think the experimental was 4, even though that isn't supposed to happen. I'm absolutely positive the questions were from the right sections (I specifically checked each section to make sure), and she remembered the questions i was talking about before I even finished discussing them, so I dont see any other explanation. The lr experimental was number 4 if you had the same order as me.

EDIT: and no, the real lg didn't have ice expeditions. The real one had books, bikes, and ambassadors.


completely agree with you. it was the fourth.

User avatar
kingjones59
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:28 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby kingjones59 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:36 pm

two first-time posters trying to say a LR after the break was experimental....dont believe it

mike22222
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby mike22222 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:41 pm

it is impossible for the 4 th to be exp

mike22222
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby mike22222 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:41 pm

i got LR LG LR LR RC really hoping the first LR was experimental. any thoughts on that?

skulz
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby skulz » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:43 pm

Was one about paintings in LG?.. and was the ambassadors one a circular table?

User avatar
rivermaker
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:16 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby rivermaker » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:45 pm

the LR sections are in different order in different tests i think. I had LR1 (25 LR3 26 LR4 26.. Unless lsac is doing something new my LR3 had to be the experimental. People without LR LR LR said it was 25 26 in each section. Also did section 3 have hella giant principle questions? 2 or 3 towards the middle end

User avatar
Strange
Posts: 741
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby Strange » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:47 pm

Does anyone think this LR was harder than Junes?

Bstbll
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby Bstbll » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:52 pm

kingjones59 wrote:two first-time posters trying to say a LR after the break was experimental....dont believe it



Believe me or not. I promise you I'm telling the truth, talk to some of your friends who also took it. There's no actual rule that says the experimental can't be after the break, it's just a pattern they've followed in the past, you'll see that I'm right. I'd post the topics of the actual questions I used to compare so you can see for yourself, but I'm pretty sure i'd get banned for that. To be fair though, wouldn't I also lie about the games if I was trying to be a ****?

Anyways, I'm just putting it out there. Believe me or not, you'll agree with me in a couple weeks.

EDIT: real rc was dostoyevsky, evolutionary psychology, Mexican American proverbs, and unified something theory (something from economics) applied to crime.

for what it's worth, I'm PRAYING you're right. I hope section 3 for me was the experimental (had one really long principle question), I was the least comfortable with that one. Unfortunately I don't think it's the case.
Last edited by Bstbll on Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

christopher.jdc
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby christopher.jdc » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:55 pm

I had two RC... WHo ever that had 1 RC do they remember what they have?

I remember one section i had ==> Bees, frankinsten, national park and law vs morals

AJ78
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby AJ78 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:57 pm

I had LR LG LR LR RC! My first LR was ridiculously hard compared to the other LR's :S. I don't remember how many questions there were. Frankenstein wasn't on real RC. I want to say LR 1 was the experimental but it might jsut be because I didn't do great on it lol.

User avatar
Strange
Posts: 741
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby Strange » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:58 pm

christopher.jdc wrote:I had two RC... WHo ever that had 1 RC do they remember what they have?

I remember one section i had ==> Bees, frankinsten, national park and law vs morals


Thats the exp

skulz
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby skulz » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:01 pm

Really freaking out because for some reason I don't remember the bikes one, but I remember the ambassadors one. And I could have sworn the ambassadors one was in a different section than the books one. Ah hell

User avatar
boblawlob
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby boblawlob » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:04 pm

deleted
Last edited by boblawlob on Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
rivermaker
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:16 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby rivermaker » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:04 pm

LIST HOW MANY QUESTIONS YOUR LR SECTIONS HAD (sec1 25 sec3 26 sec4 26. section 3 has to be experimental for me then right? lsac has never had an experimental section on section 4 and 5. I am just gonna assume this to continue. And people without LR LR LR had 25 and 26 questions. Plus the questions were fkin weird in section 3

User avatar
mmk33
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 1:32 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby mmk33 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:06 pm

skulz wrote:Really freaking out because for some reason I don't remember the bikes one, but I remember the ambassadors one. And I could have sworn the ambassadors one was in a different section than the books one. Ah hell


I agree. I don't remember the content for any of the games in the LG, I remember the setup for games #1 and #3, but I cant even remember that for games 2 and 4.

User avatar
SisterRayVU
Posts: 134
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:56 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby SisterRayVU » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:09 pm

Ugh. I had to LGs. The experimental LG hit me as experimental as it was much easier and I'm pretty sure I -0ed it whereas I had to guess on two on the last game of the real LG :(

And the RC now that I think about it may have sucked with the first passage... :/

User avatar
boblawlob
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby boblawlob » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:14 pm

deleted
Last edited by boblawlob on Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

jlhero
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:52 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby jlhero » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:17 pm

which lg was real?

the one with Zambia ambassadors or the one with fall oceans?




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], blackpi, dontsaywhatyoumean, jonny27, Pozzo and 6 guests