OCT 2011 Experimental Section

User avatar
qbt1990
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby qbt1990 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:22 pm

rivermaker wrote:why do i see fkin people creating new accounts to say that the experimental was the 4th section. Saw 3 people so far. Either there are fuckin trolls coming in to freak people out OR for the first time in lsat history the 4th section was the experimental. im leaning towards the latter, but if you are trying to make people feel like shit you have succeeded.



No seriously don't be rude, I am not trying to freak ANYBODY out I swear on my family I have talked to 3 people now and I am confident my 4th section was experimental!! I'm freaking out too, I wanted it to be the third one and I am in shock/disbelief right now
PS I'm a nice person I'm not trying to make anyone feel like shit hahaha, trust me I am not happy with this either
Last edited by qbt1990 on Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
rivermaker
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:16 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby rivermaker » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:23 pm

i want you to tell me how you can conclusively prove that LR 4 was exp. Isn't it possible you mixed up which sections had which questions ??

User avatar
qbt1990
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby qbt1990 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:24 pm

rivermaker wrote:i want you to tell me how you can conclusively prove that LR 4 was exp. Isn't it possible you mixed up which sections had which questions ??


Personally I specifically remembered the topics of two questions from each of my 3 LR sections (1, 3, 4). Three of my friends remember the topics from sections 1 and 3. No one remembers the topics I had in section 4. I'm 100% positive I'm not mixing up questions to sections and another poster said the same thing.
Last edited by qbt1990 on Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:25 pm, edited 7 times in total.

drobe24
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 12:42 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby drobe24 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:24 pm

senorhosh wrote:
Bstbll wrote:Everyone else is talking about question topics, so I'll just go ahead and do it I guess.

For me, there was one section (1) with questions about 1. choosing game show prizes, and 2. bacteria in sewage with heavy metal. One section (3) had questions about 1. the acceptability of going into other peoples' computers and 2. pizza chains accepting coupons (this section had a couple really long questions). And one section (4) had questions about 1. dogs emotional attachment to their masters (or something along those lines), and 2. great apes recognizing themselves in the mirror. Dogs and apes were the experimental, according to everyone I've spoken to.


Um i had 3 LR sections. I got same section as your first one but the second one I haven't seen it.

I think there were TWO DIFFERENT experimental sections for LG and LR.

Does anyone remember if an LR had one about the oxygen consumption/global warming on animals in the arctic/tropics?
is that experimental or not?


I had three LR sections and nothing on that topic.

mike22222
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby mike22222 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:24 pm

Those who had two LR sections only: do you recall a question about explaining the paradox of tornadoes since 1950 something and the answers mentioning the way they are recorded ? This would help a lot

User avatar
zdamico
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:57 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby zdamico » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:24 pm

qbt1990 wrote:
rivermaker wrote:why do i see fkin people creating new accounts to say that the experimental was the 4th section. Saw 3 people so far. Either there are fuckin trolls coming in to freak people out OR for the first time in lsat history the 4th section was the experimental. im leaning towards the latter, but if you are trying to make people feel like shit you have succeeded.



No seriously don't be rude, I am not trying to freak ANYBODY out I swear on my family I have talked to 3 people now and I am confident my 4th section was experimental!! I'm freaking out too, I wanted it to be the third one and I am in shock/disbelief right now
PS I'm a nice person I'm not trying to make anyone feel like shit hahaha, trust me I am not happy with this either


Did you have Apes looking in mirrors?

User avatar
happyshapy
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby happyshapy » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:25 pm

-
Last edited by happyshapy on Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Bstbll
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:16 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby Bstbll » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:26 pm

rivermaker wrote:i want you to tell me how you can conclusively prove that LR 4 was exp. Isn't it possible you mixed up which sections had which questions ??



Can I conclusively prove it to you? No. There's no way for me to prove it over the internet. That being said, I'm 100% positive I had the sections right, and people who had the same copy of the test seem to be recalling the same thing.

did you have the dog question, the ape question, and the old/new flowers question in your section 4? was it 25 questions?


I know this wasn't directed towards me, but assuming the flowers question you're talking about was something about fragrances and colors, then my answer is yes.

User avatar
qbt1990
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:50 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby qbt1990 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:27 pm

happyshapy wrote:
qbt1990 wrote:
rivermaker wrote:i want you to tell me how you can conclusively prove that LR 4 was exp. Isn't it possible you mixed up which sections had which questions ??


Personally I specifically remembered the topics of two questions from each of my 3 LR sections (1, 3, 4). Three of my friends remember the topics from sections 1 and 3. No one remembers the topics I had in section 4. I'm 100% positive i"m not mixing up questions to sections and another poster said the same thing.


did you have the dog question, the ape question, and the old/new flowers question in your section 4? was it 25 questions?


I don't remember any of those things.
Last edited by qbt1990 on Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
learntolift
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby learntolift » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:28 pm

happyshapy wrote:
qbt1990 wrote:
rivermaker wrote:i want you to tell me how you can conclusively prove that LR 4 was exp. Isn't it possible you mixed up which sections had which questions ??


Personally I specifically remembered the topics of two questions from each of my 3 LR sections (1, 3, 4). Three of my friends remember the topics from sections 1 and 3. No one remembers the topics I had in section 4. I'm 100% positive i"m not mixing up questions to sections and another poster said the same thing.


did you have the dog question, the ape question, and the old/new flowers question in your section 4? was it 25 questions?

i had the apes and the dogs (same section) it was my 4th section

hot spots was my 3rd section

first section i forget what it was

but 4th was experimental at least for me, 100%

drobe24
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 12:42 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby drobe24 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:28 pm

mike22222 wrote:Those who had two LR sections only: do you recall a question about explaining the paradox of tornadoes since 1950 something and the answers mentioning the way they are recorded ? This would help a lot


I had 3 LR's too.
But I just wanted to add, for whoever is answering this, what section was it in and how many questions did it have?

bt53
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:21 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bt53 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:30 pm

I had 25lr 23lg 26lr 26lr 27rc and I'm almost definite I didn't have any questions about apes looking in mirrors. From what I recall my 3rd section (2ndlr) started with a question about energy transportation and talked about how certain fuels had been profitable/more efficient. I also recall that lr section had a question near the end about video rental coupons but I'm not definite

User avatar
srrrrh
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:28 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby srrrrh » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:31 pm

...
Last edited by srrrrh on Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

mike22222
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby mike22222 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:33 pm

The tornado one was section 1 for me. Can not remember the number of question but I believe it was 25 (not sure though !)

User avatar
neeko
Posts: 942
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby neeko » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:34 pm

Bstbll wrote:
rivermaker wrote:i want you to tell me how you can conclusively prove that LR 4 was exp. Isn't it possible you mixed up which sections had which questions ??



Can I conclusively prove it to you? No. There's no way for me to prove it over the internet. That being said, I'm 100% positive I had the sections right, and people who had the same copy of the test seem to be recalling the same thing.

did you have the dog question, the ape question, and the old/new flowers question in your section 4? was it 25 questions?


I know this wasn't directed towards me, but assuming the flowers question you're talking about was something about fragrances and colors, then my answer is yes.


I didn't have this question and I had 3 LR.

User avatar
kedinik
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:14 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby kedinik » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:34 pm

...
Last edited by kedinik on Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
happyshapy
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby happyshapy » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:35 pm

bt53 wrote:I had 25lr 23lg 26lr 26lr 27rc and I'm almost definite I didn't have any questions about apes looking in mirrors. From what I recall my 3rd section (2ndlr) started with a question about energy transportation and talked about how certain fuels had been profitable/more efficient. I also recall that lr section had a question near the end about video rental coupons but I'm not definite


i had video rental coupons for my second lr section as well (3rd overall section). this was also the same section with mickey's pizza. so maybe the 4th section experimental had two versions, one with 26 and one with 25. that make sense that some ppl didn't have the flowers one

mike22222
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby mike22222 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:35 pm

@srrrh do You remember if the tornado section started with a question about some professor In the first few questions ?

User avatar
happyshapy
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby happyshapy » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:35 pm

neeko wrote:
Bstbll wrote:
rivermaker wrote:i want you to tell me how you can conclusively prove that LR 4 was exp. Isn't it possible you mixed up which sections had which questions ??



Can I conclusively prove it to you? No. There's no way for me to prove it over the internet. That being said, I'm 100% positive I had the sections right, and people who had the same copy of the test seem to be recalling the same thing.

did you have the dog question, the ape question, and the old/new flowers question in your section 4? was it 25 questions?


I know this wasn't directed towards me, but assuming the flowers question you're talking about was something about fragrances and colors, then my answer is yes.


I didn't have this question and I had 3 LR.


how many questions were in each LR?

User avatar
neeko
Posts: 942
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby neeko » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:36 pm

srrrrh wrote:
mike22222 wrote:Those who had two LR sections only: do you recall a question about explaining the paradox of tornadoes since 1950 something and the answers mentioning the way they are recorded ? This would help a lot


my experimental was RC and i def. had the tornadoes question. i had the video rentals and fuel transportation section as well


Do you remember what else was with the video coupons? I think that was my 4th section 3rd LR but I want to be sure.

EMZE
Posts: 715
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby EMZE » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:38 pm

As a tester who had 3 LR's:

To the best of my recollection, my sections were
LR(25), LG(23), LR(26), LR(25), and RC (27).

LR1 I believed to be significantly harder than my LR2 and LR3.

I remember LR1 having much fewer assumption/inference questions than normal.

I remember LR2 having 2 finish the sentence/main point questions in the first 2 pages. This also seemed to have quite a few assumption questions

LR3 does not stand out to me at all. Pretty standard breakdown of question types. I believe that of the last 6 or so, there were like 3 assumptions and 1 parallel reasoning.

I hope LR1 is exp for me, as that will probably swing my score 3+ points

User avatar
boblawlob
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby boblawlob » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:40 pm

deleted
Last edited by boblawlob on Fri May 10, 2013 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

bt53
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:21 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bt53 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:41 pm

The one with the chiropractor and healing back pain was definitely on my 3rd lr (4th section overall)

itsaclassic
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:40 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby itsaclassic » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:42 pm

For ppl who had LG/RC experimental, did you have a question that involved democracy requiring fair and free elections/robust news media?

mike22222
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby mike22222 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:42 pm

@ EMZE I had the exact same thing. was your first LR with tornadoes or was the one with tornadoes the 3 rd LR. Beacuse ppl who had an extra RC say they remember that question so it means that section was real




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests