This is entirely possible. There's no reason they can't have multiple experimental sections of the same type. After all, LSAC has to test out a lot of LR questions for future exams!thejrob wrote:wouldn't that mean that there were 2 different LR experimental sections? a 26 question and a 25 question one. Would they do that?zdamico wrote:Yes, people did, meaning the LR sections HAVE to be 25 and 26.thejrob wrote:Is it possible that some people had
LR25, LG23, LR26, LR26, RC27
and others had
LR25, LG23, LR26, LR25, RC27
??
OCT 2011 Experimental Section Forum
- LSAT Blog
- Posts: 1257
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:56 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
.
Last edited by poi on Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 941law
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:21 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
19-27?poi wrote:Anyone remember number of questions on d...vski RC passage?
- Tim0thy222
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:57 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Did the real LG have ice expeditions and ocean expeditions?
If yes, see you at UVA.
If no, see you at Cooley.
If yes, see you at UVA.
If no, see you at Cooley.
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
QFTTim0thy222 wrote:Did the real LG have ice expeditions and ocean expeditions?
If yes, see you at UVA.
If no, see you at Cooley.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- zozin
- Posts: 3732
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Mailman just dropped off some Cooley paraphernalia. If that's not a bad omen, I don't know what is.Tim0thy222 wrote: If no, see you at Cooley.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:16 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Guys, I spoke with my girlfriend, who was also taking the lsat today. She had the double lg test, I had a triple lr (1-3-4, 25-26-25). I specifically made sure I remembered a few questions from each lr section to ask her if she had them. When we compared, she remembered having questions from 1 and 3 for me, which makes me think the experimental was 4, even though that isn't supposed to happen. I'm absolutely positive the questions were from the right sections (I specifically checked each section to make sure), and she remembered the questions i was talking about before I even finished discussing them, so I dont see any other explanation. The lr experimental was number 4 if you had the same order as me.
EDIT: and no, the real lg didn't have ice expeditions. The real one had books, bikes, and ambassadors.
EDIT: and no, the real lg didn't have ice expeditions. The real one had books, bikes, and ambassadors.
- szb5058
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:33 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
completely agree with you. it was the fourth.Bstbll wrote:Guys, I spoke with my girlfriend, who was also taking the lsat today. She had the double lg test, I had a triple lr (1-3-4, 25-26-25). I specifically made sure I remembered a few questions from each lr section to ask her if she had them. When we compared, she remembered having questions from 1 and 3 for me, which makes me think the experimental was 4, even though that isn't supposed to happen. I'm absolutely positive the questions were from the right sections (I specifically checked each section to make sure), and she remembered the questions i was talking about before I even finished discussing them, so I dont see any other explanation. The lr experimental was number 4 if you had the same order as me.
EDIT: and no, the real lg didn't have ice expeditions. The real one had books, bikes, and ambassadors.
- kingjones59
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:28 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
two first-time posters trying to say a LR after the break was experimental....dont believe it
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
it is impossible for the 4 th to be exp
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:25 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
i got LR LG LR LR RC really hoping the first LR was experimental. any thoughts on that?
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:41 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Was one about paintings in LG?.. and was the ambassadors one a circular table?
- rivermaker
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:16 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
the LR sections are in different order in different tests i think. I had LR1 (25 LR3 26 LR4 26.. Unless lsac is doing something new my LR3 had to be the experimental. People without LR LR LR said it was 25 26 in each section. Also did section 3 have hella giant principle questions? 2 or 3 towards the middle end
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Strange
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Does anyone think this LR was harder than Junes?
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:16 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
kingjones59 wrote:two first-time posters trying to say a LR after the break was experimental....dont believe it
Believe me or not. I promise you I'm telling the truth, talk to some of your friends who also took it. There's no actual rule that says the experimental can't be after the break, it's just a pattern they've followed in the past, you'll see that I'm right. I'd post the topics of the actual questions I used to compare so you can see for yourself, but I'm pretty sure i'd get banned for that. To be fair though, wouldn't I also lie about the games if I was trying to be a ****?
Anyways, I'm just putting it out there. Believe me or not, you'll agree with me in a couple weeks.
EDIT: real rc was dostoyevsky, evolutionary psychology, Mexican American proverbs, and unified something theory (something from economics) applied to crime.
for what it's worth, I'm PRAYING you're right. I hope section 3 for me was the experimental (had one really long principle question), I was the least comfortable with that one. Unfortunately I don't think it's the case.
Last edited by Bstbll on Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:50 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
I had two RC... WHo ever that had 1 RC do they remember what they have?
I remember one section i had ==> Bees, frankinsten, national park and law vs morals
I remember one section i had ==> Bees, frankinsten, national park and law vs morals
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:50 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
I had LR LG LR LR RC! My first LR was ridiculously hard compared to the other LR's :S. I don't remember how many questions there were. Frankenstein wasn't on real RC. I want to say LR 1 was the experimental but it might jsut be because I didn't do great on it lol.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Strange
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Thats the expchristopher.jdc wrote:I had two RC... WHo ever that had 1 RC do they remember what they have?
I remember one section i had ==> Bees, frankinsten, national park and law vs morals
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:41 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Really freaking out because for some reason I don't remember the bikes one, but I remember the ambassadors one. And I could have sworn the ambassadors one was in a different section than the books one. Ah hell
- boblawlob
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
deleted
Last edited by boblawlob on Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- rivermaker
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:16 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
LIST HOW MANY QUESTIONS YOUR LR SECTIONS HAD (sec1 25 sec3 26 sec4 26. section 3 has to be experimental for me then right? lsac has never had an experimental section on section 4 and 5. I am just gonna assume this to continue. And people without LR LR LR had 25 and 26 questions. Plus the questions were fkin weird in section 3
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mmk33
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 1:32 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
skulz wrote:Really freaking out because for some reason I don't remember the bikes one, but I remember the ambassadors one. And I could have sworn the ambassadors one was in a different section than the books one. Ah hell
I agree. I don't remember the content for any of the games in the LG, I remember the setup for games #1 and #3, but I cant even remember that for games 2 and 4.
- SisterRayVU
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:56 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
Ugh. I had to LGs. The experimental LG hit me as experimental as it was much easier and I'm pretty sure I -0ed it whereas I had to guess on two on the last game of the real LG
And the RC now that I think about it may have sucked with the first passage... :/
And the RC now that I think about it may have sucked with the first passage... :/
- boblawlob
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
deleted
Last edited by boblawlob on Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:52 pm
Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section
which lg was real?
the one with Zambia ambassadors or the one with fall oceans?
the one with Zambia ambassadors or the one with fall oceans?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login