OCT 2011 Experimental Section

bleern031
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:02 am

OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bleern031 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:31 pm

If any Mod reads this, is it okay to discuss, very vaguely which section we thought might have been the experimental?
(like 1 2 3 4 5).
Of course the content of any section will never be brought up.
Just if maybe it was specifically the one of the first three or last two.

User avatar
ThreeRivers
Posts: 1142
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby ThreeRivers » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:35 pm

It is always one of the 1st 3.

I knew which one mine was since I had a RC #3 and then again on my 4th one

User avatar
LSAT Blog
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby LSAT Blog » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:36 pm

Not everyone has the same experimental. Some had an LG experimental, some had an LR experimental, and some had an RC experimental.

The experimental can appear as different sections of the exam for different people. However, the experimental is consistently one of the first 3 sections of the exam.

bleern031
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:02 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bleern031 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:36 pm

ThreeRivers wrote:It is always one of the 1st 3.

I knew which one mine was since I had a RC #3 and then again on my 4th one


okay so we can keep it like that, right?

I had LR on 1 3 4. (eff me, right?)
one was significantly harder than 3 or 4. but I guess, there's no way of telling which was which.

bleern031
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:02 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bleern031 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:37 pm

LSAT Blog wrote:Not everyone has the same experimental. Some had an LG experimental, some had an LR experimental, and some had an RC experimental.

The experimental can appear as different sections of the exam for different people. However, the experimental is consistently one of the first 3 sections of the exam.


Thanks for this information.

StrongSofts
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby StrongSofts » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:40 pm

I had LR 1 LG 2 LR 3 LR 4 RC 5

I am praying to god 1 was the experimental as I think I bombed it. They had us sitting around for 45 minutes dealing with administrative shit and waiting and it totally threw me off. All that time waiting and thinking just upped the stress and pressure. LG 2 gave me my confidence back and I did good on LR 3. Than that break for some reason just totally relaxed me and I owned LR 4. RC 5 was iffy that Dostoevsky passage took me a lot longer than it should have and I was pressured for time at the end.

FAJISTE
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:04 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby FAJISTE » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:42 pm

Dude, I had a logic games 1st section then LR then another Logic games on the 3rd section. I GOT RAPED by the 3rd section one. Overall I think I did very well on the rest of the test but that 3rd section. Soon found out it was experimental. WIN

I knew it was experimental while taking it; it was nothing like the last 10 games at all.

bleern031
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:02 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bleern031 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:46 pm

StrongSofts wrote:I had LR 1 LG 2 LR 3 LR 4 RC 5

I am praying to god 1 was the experimental as I think I bombed it. They had us sitting around for 45 minutes dealing with administrative shit and waiting and it totally threw me off. All that time waiting and thinking just upped the stress and pressure. LG 2 gave me my confidence back and I did good on LR 3. Than that break for some reason just totally relaxed me and I owned LR 4. RC 5 was iffy that Dostoevsky passage took me a lot longer than it should have and I was pressured for time at the end.


Exact same situation.
I prey that LR 1 was the experimental. Would that be likely at all? first one being it?
I mean lol, wow I bombed it.
You guys are welcome, I supported your curve significantly.

User avatar
JustE
Posts: 1330
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby JustE » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:46 pm

StrongSofts wrote:I had LR 1 LG 2 LR 3 LR 4 RC 5

I am praying to god 1 was the experimental as I think I bombed it. They had us sitting around for 45 minutes dealing with administrative shit and waiting and it totally threw me off. All that time waiting and thinking just upped the stress and pressure. LG 2 gave me my confidence back and I did good on LR 3. Than that break for some reason just totally relaxed me and I owned LR 4. RC 5 was iffy that Dostoevsky passage took me a lot longer than it should have and I was pressured for time at the end.


Same. I think that unless there were 102 questions (possible, but unlikely) the third was the experimental, as mine had 27 questions.

bp shinners
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bp shinners » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:47 pm

bleern031 wrote:Exact same situation.
I prey that LR 1 was the experimental. Would that be likely at all? first one being it?
I mean lol, wow I bombed it.
You guys are welcome, I supported your curve significantly.


It's just as likely as any other section to be the experimental one, so you might be good.

And the test isn't curved around people's performance today, so no one here is praying for you to bomb it!

User avatar
zdamico
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:57 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby zdamico » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:52 pm

I have a question.

Is it possible that there were two different LR experimental sections? I have seen people saying they had 25 26 and 26 for 3 LR sections, but I had 25 25 26.

StrongSofts
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby StrongSofts » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:52 pm

I know it sounds bad but I am happy at least a bunch of other people bombed section 1 LR. Hopefully this means that that was the experimental. If it isn't the experimental, and I do not cancel I am going to be sick.

bp shinners
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bp shinners » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:52 pm

zdamico wrote:I have a question.

Is it possible that there were two different LR experimental sections? I have seen people saying they had 25 26 and 26 for 3 LR sections, but I had 25 25 26.


Yes, it's possible.

User avatar
maru
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 3:44 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby maru » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:54 pm

egirarde wrote:
StrongSofts wrote:I had LR 1 LG 2 LR 3 LR 4 RC 5

I am praying to god 1 was the experimental as I think I bombed it. They had us sitting around for 45 minutes dealing with administrative shit and waiting and it totally threw me off. All that time waiting and thinking just upped the stress and pressure. LG 2 gave me my confidence back and I did good on LR 3. Than that break for some reason just totally relaxed me and I owned LR 4. RC 5 was iffy that Dostoevsky passage took me a lot longer than it should have and I was pressured for time at the end.


Same. I think that unless there were 102 questions (possible, but unlikely) the third was the experimental, as mine had 27 questions.

Oh, damn, you're right. I had LR(25), LG(23), LR(26), LR(26), RC(27). This probably means the 3rd section was an experimental. Damn, I know I bombed section 1 because my timing was way off. :(

User avatar
zdamico
Posts: 167
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:57 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby zdamico » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:55 pm

bp shinners wrote:
zdamico wrote:I have a question.

Is it possible that there were two different LR experimental sections? I have seen people saying they had 25 26 and 26 for 3 LR sections, but I had 25 25 26.


Yes, it's possible.



Well then unless people are mistaken, LR sections are 25 and 26, its the only possibility.

bleern031
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:02 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bleern031 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:55 pm

bp shinners wrote:
zdamico wrote:I have a question.

Is it possible that there were two different LR experimental sections? I have seen people saying they had 25 26 and 26 for 3 LR sections, but I had 25 25 26.


Yes, it's possible.



if you had 25 25 26. That means for those of use who had 26 26 25 one of the 26 was experimental.
Which means LR1 was real. That just makes me sad.

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby sinfiery » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:58 pm

LSAT Blog wrote:Not everyone has the same experimental. Some had an LG experimental, some had an LR experimental, and some had an RC experimental.

The experimental can appear as different sections of the exam for different people. However, the experimental is consistently one of the first 3 sections of the exam.

Can anyone verify this?

I love Bee's but no books a separate thing from bee's and I just don't know...
Last edited by sinfiery on Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cda3t
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:44 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby cda3t » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:59 pm

Book was real

bp shinners
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bp shinners » Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:59 pm

sinfiery wrote:
LSAT Blog wrote:Not everyone has the same experimental. Some had an LG experimental, some had an LR experimental, and some had an RC experimental.

The experimental can appear as different sections of the exam for different people. However, the experimental is consistently one of the first 3 sections of the exam.

Can anyone verify this?

I love Bee's but no books a separate thing from bee's and I just don't know...


That's how it has always been. Not necessarily a trend that will continue, but I'd put money on it holding.

bleern031
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:02 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby bleern031 » Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:00 pm

so when do we actually find out ?
I know our grades come in three weeks.
But how about the rest etc

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby sinfiery » Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:01 pm

bp shinners wrote:
sinfiery wrote:
LSAT Blog wrote:Not everyone has the same experimental. Some had an LG experimental, some had an LR experimental, and some had an RC experimental.

The experimental can appear as different sections of the exam for different people. However, the experimental is consistently one of the first 3 sections of the exam.

Can anyone verify this?

I love Bee's but no books a separate thing from bee's and I just don't know...


That's how it has always been. Not necessarily a trend that will continue, but I'd put money on it holding.

Seems to be true atleast in 1 more situation....I think that makes me happy but who really knows..!

User avatar
SarahT
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby SarahT » Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:02 pm

I had LR (25) LG (23) LR (26) LR (26) and RC (27)

I am still holding on to the hope that we had a 102 question test and the first LR with 25 was exp. Awful!

User avatar
SarahT
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:41 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby SarahT » Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:02 pm

I had LR (25) LG (23) LR (26) LR (26) and RC (27)

I am still holding on to the hope that we had a 102 question test and the first LR with 25 was exp. Awful!

User avatar
LSAT Blog
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby LSAT Blog » Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:05 pm

bleern031 wrote:so when do we actually find out ?
I know our grades come in three weeks.
But how about the rest etc


I predict Monday, October 24th, as being the most-likely actual score release date.

carpenter.
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 11:36 pm

Re: OCT 2011 Experimental Section

Postby carpenter. » Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:06 pm

FAJISTE wrote:Dude, I had a logic games 1st section then LR then another Logic games on the 3rd section. I GOT RAPED by the 3rd section one. Overall I think I did very well on the rest of the test but that 3rd section. Soon found out it was experimental. WIN

I knew it was experimental while taking it; it was nothing like the last 10 games at all.


I had the same, but was hoping the first was experimental. The third I actually felt good about! C'est la vie!




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cherrygalore, Instrumental, VMars and 6 guests