What is the main conclusion of #19, PT 63 Section 3

User avatar
timmydoeslsat
Posts: 148
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:07 pm

What is the main conclusion of #19, PT 63 Section 3

Postby timmydoeslsat » Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:35 pm

I feel that it is "any history book gives only a distorted view of the past"

I feel that everything else in the stimulus supports that idea.

Am I correct in that assessment?

Manhattan LSAT Noah
Posts: 746
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:43 am

Re: What is the main conclusion of #19, PT 63 Section 3

Postby Manhattan LSAT Noah » Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:43 pm

I'd agree with you, but I wouldn't bet a lot of money.

But, as usual, the LSAT constructs the question in such a way that our geeky-nit-pickiness (which, Timmydoeslsat, you know is a compliment) doesn't matter. Regardless of which conclusion is the conclusion, the other one is part of a similar argument used to support the other.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests