New LG Substitution rule...

User avatar
paulshortys10
Posts: 619
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:03 pm

New LG Substitution rule...

Postby paulshortys10 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 12:51 am

I sure as hell don't want to lose 1 LG point because of this damn question , so I want to make sure I completely understand it. OK so this is what I know about tackling this question so far.

1. Review past hypos, IF the AC is not true in A past hypo, then count that puppy out.
2.This usually eliminates 2-3 AC's...Leaving 2-3 available AC's still. So this is where I get tricked out. You're supposed to create a hypo for each, where the NEW rule is substituted, yet proves the old rule wrong?...and these are wrong answers....

I feel this can be explained better cause that last part confuses me....ALso any tips on finding the right answer quickly are appreciated



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Veil of Ignorance and 6 guests