PT 59 Section 2 Q18

Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:43 pm

PT 59 Section 2 Q18

Postby nygrl » Thu Sep 01, 2011 10:47 am

I initially chose C for this question. I understand why C is wrong but I do not understand why D is the correct answer.

What bothers me is the use of the term "general fact". I think of a fact as an agreed upon statement, like "that house is blue". If the author is disagreeing with Malthus on this argument, how can it be considered a fact?

Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!

User avatar
LSAT World
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:12 pm

Re: PT 59 Section 2 Q18

Postby LSAT World » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:04 am

This question asks what role is played by a statement in the argument. The statement, which is found in the first statement, is presented as a general fact and is not debated. However, the argument goes on to say that this fact will change in the future, so (D) is the credited response.

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 34iplaw, Alexandros, Baidu [Spider], dj9i27, proteinshake and 5 guests