6 posts • Page 1 of 1
- suspicious android
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm
You're describing the author's method of reasoning here. he's attacking the psychologist's presumably flawed argument. That doesn't mean that the answer choice will be a flawed method of reasoning though.
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:04 pm
glucose101 wrote:The tip-off is "by," which suggests how the author mistakenly argues.
The author didn't necessarily "mistakenly" argue anything. He could have made a valid argument.
This is a pure method of reasoning question. The answer will describe the argument, flawed or otherwise.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], chargers21 and 5 guests