Page 1 of 1

PT 18 (December 1992) Section 2 - #21

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:25 pm
by forps
I quite don't get this question. How does (A) strenghtens the position that the traditional attribution of a disputed painting should not have special weight?

Disputed paintings: Those without a signature or with a questionably authentic signature.

Any help is appreciated.

Re: PT 18 (December 1992) Section 2 - #21

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:12 pm
by Manhattan LSAT Noah
Perhaps this discussion will help

Re: PT 18 (December 1992) Section 2 - #21

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:35 pm
by forps
Manhattan LSAT Noah wrote:Perhaps this discussion will help
Thanks for the help.

I fully understood the question now.

Thanks again!