LR, LG, LR, LR, RC (which was experimental?) Forum

[Yeags]

I also had LR LG LR LR RC. The first LR was incredibly easy for me, so I thought that might've been the experimental.

[baconpuffs]

I had 2 LG, so if you're concerned about which LR is experimental feel free to PM me.

[chasy_price]

Well one of my LR is experimental and to be honest after that bombing RC I don't remember any LR questions.....

So guess we will just have to see.

[pkrtbx]

I had the same format, 3rd LR was difficult but LG was SO KIND TO ME. As someone who loathes LG, I literally spent the entire break doing mental calculations of question numbers to make sure that that LG wasn't experimental and that I wasn't actually still dreaming.

[john1990]

For me the 1st LR was hard, idk how but i looked down and 20min in i was on Q14 thats the slowest pace ive ever done and i really let time get away from me. Ended up completing the last 5 in 5 minutes combined, which usually equates to me missing like half of them in a rush. LR 3 i was focused and pissed off at the balls so i finished with 3 minutes to go and reviewed, but i still dont remember like any of the Q's

[Bb1]

OK so I'm pretty sure I'm not crazy but I see people with different amounts of questions for the sections...

I believe I had LR (25 q's), LG, LR (25 q's), LR (26 q's), RC...sound familiar to anyone? btw, I'm an eastcoaster if it makes any diff.

I see some people have mentioned having a 24 Q section of LR? But the vast majority of people I have seen said two 25 Q sections and one 26 Q section for LR...and everyone says the 26 Q question is a real section, is this right?

For me the 26 Q LR section was a breeze, VERY easy so I am really hoping it was not the experimental. One of the 25 Q LR sections was really difficult and the other 25 Q section was in the middle. Does this sound right to everyone? I mean that would make sense since if it were the two 25 Q LR sections that were actually scored then there would not be 101 questions?

Also my first LR section (25 Q's) which was the first section of the test was the super difficult one for me. The second LR section (also 25 Q's) was in the middle as far as difficulty is concerned and the last and (26 Q) LR section was by far the easiest.

Please give me feedback...Thanks! <3

[cph4life]

I also really though I had 25 in the 2nd LR.

[boosk]

1st:25
2nd:25
3rd:26

[whipy]

1st:25
2nd:25
3rd:26

Yeah, but which was experimental? Anyone know for sure? Any key words were in the experimental LR that would help to identify it?

If someone who had just 2xLR would post key words from theirs we could identify the experimental by deduction. Chopin has been bandied around so much that it is clear that this was the REAL RC, but nothing that helps to identify the 2 real LR sections.

[Bb1]

Well everyone who had only to LR's said the sections consisted of one 25 q section and one 26 q section so its obviously not the 26 q section. So that at least helps narrow it down.

[whipy]

Well everyone who had only to LR's said the sections consisted of one 25 q section and one 26 q section so its obviously not the 26 q section. So that at least helps narrow it down.

Yeah, but I don't remember which was 26Q. Also, we still have 2 that were 25Q to choose from....

I'm hoping it was LR1. I'd prefer it to be LR3 because that seemed wierd, but since it seems it has to have been one of the first 3 sections it would have it be LR1 or LR2.

[boosk]

1st:25
2nd:25
3rd:26

Yeah, but which was experimental? Anyone know for sure? Any key words were in the experimental LR that would help to identify it?

If someone who had just 2xLR would post key words from theirs we could identify the experimental by deduction. Chopin has been bandied around so much that it is clear that this was the REAL RC, but nothing that helps to identify the 2 real LR sections.

Im not sure if anyone remembers this, but the last Q on one of the 1st LR sections was a point of agreement question. These are pretty rare, so Im thinking this might have been the exp. but they have appeared before so it could've been real...

idk how much identifying the exp. would be helpful to me since I would never be able to remember which Q's were and weren't in it, hope this helps though

[leche]

Im not sure if anyone remembers this, but the last Q on one of the 1st LR sections was a point of agreement question. These are pretty rare, so Im thinking this might have been the exp. but they have appeared before so it could've been real...

Ugh I saw this in a few posts and I have no recollection of it, which means either it was experimental or I obviously missed a question

[baconpuffs]

1st:25
2nd:25
3rd:26

Yeah, but which was experimental? Anyone know for sure? Any key words were in the experimental LR that would help to identify it?

If someone who had just 2xLR would post key words from theirs we could identify the experimental by deduction. Chopin has been bandied around so much that it is clear that this was the REAL RC, but nothing that helps to identify the 2 real LR sections.

Im not sure if anyone remembers this, but the last Q on one of the 1st LR sections was a point of agreement question. These are pretty rare, so Im thinking this might have been the exp.

TITCR

[whipy]

I had 2 LG, so if you're concerned about which LR is experimental feel free to PM me.

Did that, but no reply ...