June 2011 LG Opinions

justbubbles
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:20 pm

June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby justbubbles » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:47 pm

Thoughts? :D

smithryan94
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:40 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby smithryan94 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:48 pm

I had two LG. LG-LR-LG//RC-LR

I thought the first one was above average difficulty and the second one was below average. As a reference I'm usually -0 to -3

smithryan94
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:40 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby smithryan94 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:00 pm

Anyone with that format know which is experimental?

justbubbles
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:20 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby justbubbles » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:03 pm

For those that got just one LG section, please PM me! Thanks!

acirilli1722
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:22 am

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby acirilli1722 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:04 pm

.
Last edited by acirilli1722 on Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
citykitty
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:03 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby citykitty » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:05 pm

...
Last edited by citykitty on Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

justbubbles
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:20 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby justbubbles » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:05 pm

The LG appeared for those who had just one LG was the real time.

If that's you, then send me a PM! :D

cvntstscrty
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby cvntstscrty » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:12 pm

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL December 2010 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

justbubbles
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:20 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby justbubbles » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:21 pm

cvntstscrty wrote:LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL December 2010 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.


With all due respect, I think people are more interested in discussing the June 2011 test as opposed to the December 2010 questions, which have already been released by LSAC. ;)

User avatar
BLDGbloc
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 4:53 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby BLDGbloc » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:25 pm

justbubbles wrote:
cvntstscrty wrote:LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL December 2010 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.


With all due respect, I think people are more interested in discussing the June 2011 test as opposed to the December 2010 questions, which have already been released by LSAC. ;)


Burn.

mille295
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:26 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby mille295 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:32 pm

I had 2 LG sections. First I found pretty difficult... Filled in answers randomly for more than I would have liked. Second I finished with time to spare, knowing I got all of them right... Also found out that was the experimental section.

Hating my life right now. Drinking a glass of wine to calm my nerves before I decide whether or not to cancel.

User avatar
mac35352
Posts: 371
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:17 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby mac35352 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:37 pm

I got two LGs as well..pm me if u only had one

mrwarre85
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:40 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby mrwarre85 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:39 pm

I thought games were easier than usual. That said, I wrote a rule down wrong on a game and didn't have time to fix the damage. I probably missed 5 on the whole section which is a real bummer because I did think that these games were weak.

Especially my game on the first page it was so easy I was convinced that the section was the experimental.

CJJ96812
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:51 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby CJJ96812 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:41 pm

EDITED BY TLS MODS

User avatar
vissidarte27
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby vissidarte27 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:51 pm

I thought the third game was really hard, the one with the cars. I remember the first two being easy and the last one being kind of average. But I had to guess on several in the third game.

imbored25
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 8:58 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby imbored25 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:16 pm

i just had one LG, thought it was pretty easy, but LG is always my best section, RC killed me

postn0bills
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:09 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby postn0bills » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:19 pm

justbubbles wrote:
cvntstscrty wrote:LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL December 2010 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.


With all due respect, I think people are more interested in discussing the June 2011 test as opposed to the December 2010 questions, which have already been released by LSAC. ;)


AMAZING.

postn0bills
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:09 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby postn0bills » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:21 pm

mrwarre85 wrote:I thought games were easier than usual. That said, I wrote a rule down wrong on a game and didn't have time to fix the damage. I probably missed 5 on the whole section which is a real bummer because I did think that these games were weak.

Especially my game on the first page it was so easy I was convinced that the section was the experimental.


+1

I was convinced it was experimental and I think slowed down because of it. I finished the first game in five minutes and thought there was no way it was real. Had to guess on the last game blindly because I slowed down after that as I didn't think it counted. Horrible.

User avatar
pandabear
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 3:57 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby pandabear » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:23 pm

LG has always been my worst section but i thought they were pretty easy. the first game literally took like three minutes to do. RC, on the other hand... :evil:

User avatar
cindypopper
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:36 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby cindypopper » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:24 pm

So which one counted? Does anyone know. I had LG-LR-LG..RC-LR

echo
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 am

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby echo » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:28 pm

cindypopper wrote:So which one counted? Does anyone know. I had LG-LR-LG..RC-LR


I had the same set up. I am hoping the first was real but I have a bad feeling that my second LG was second. Unfortunately my brain feels like mush so I can't even remember enough to distinguish the two.

User avatar
Ginj
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 11:53 am

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby Ginj » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:28 pm

cindypopper wrote:So which one counted? Does anyone know. I had LG-LR-LG..RC-LR


I had this as well.

User avatar
handlesthetruth
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:42 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby handlesthetruth » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:29 pm

.
Last edited by handlesthetruth on Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ssushi
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 12:37 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby Ssushi » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:38 pm

Ginj wrote:
cindypopper wrote:So which one counted? Does anyone know. I had LG-LR-LG..RC-LR


I had this as well.


Same. First one crushed me but 3rd was fine.

User avatar
neeko
Posts: 942
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:41 pm

Re: June 2011 LG Opinions

Postby neeko » Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:39 pm

Did anyone else have trouble with the balls or did I just miss something?




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Tazewell, tuesdayninja and 4 guests