June 2011 LR

cvntstscrty
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby cvntstscrty » Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:48 pm

LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL June 2011 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.

User avatar
gggrra
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:26 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby gggrra » Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:59 pm

vissidarte27 wrote:
imbored25 wrote:I had LR LG LR LR RC, i thought the first LR was pretty easy so im hoping it wasn't the exp. the second LR i had trouble with and felt was harder than average, third LR was ok


I had the same format, and I'm pretty sure that the second LR (with 24 questions) was experimental. I thought for sure it would've been the first one since it was so easy, but then the test would only have 100 questions (plus people here who had another experimental said that their LRs were 25 and 26 Qs).


yea the 24 should be exp. I had two 25 question LRs but luckily both were cake...

User avatar
omninode
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby omninode » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:03 pm

Seems like LR sections keep getting easier. Today the first one was so easy I though it was experimental. It wasn't.

Maybe LSAC is neglecting LR as they focus on developing LG and RC?

User avatar
lakers3peat
Posts: 493
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:10 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby lakers3peat » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:09 pm

i had LR1, 3rd, after logic games... I was so bummed out about how I did on logic games, I can't I even tried my best on the 1st LR.... after the break I chilled out a little bit and then for the 2nd LR, which I had 5th, I was determined to show myself I could do well on LR so I did my best. consequently, I feel like the 2nd LR was way easier then the 1st, but I wasn't even challenging myself to do my best on the 1st LR which is a total mental break down on my part...

mchuynh
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:23 am

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby mchuynh » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:21 pm

LR-LG-LR-LR-RC

I didn't have enough time to finish the first LR :/ so i guessed on a few... but i had extra time for the third one..

User avatar
Quan292
Posts: 283
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 2:03 am

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby Quan292 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:38 pm

I had the LR-LG-LR -break-LR-RC type test so was the first or second LR section exp? I didnt get to 1q on the second one but the first like 6 qs on the first LR I was super distracted because my proctor and a dude who got kicked out of the test was freaking arguing! I was so tight.

mchuynh
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:23 am

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby mchuynh » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:43 pm

deleted
Last edited by mchuynh on Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Yeshia90
Posts: 988
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 12:23 am

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby Yeshia90 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:03 pm

whoops, wrong thread.
Last edited by Yeshia90 on Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Strange
Posts: 741
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby Strange » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:23 pm

I had LR 1 - 26 LR2- 24 LR3 - 26... which one was exp?

User avatar
Diiizzzzoooo
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:18 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby Diiizzzzoooo » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:31 pm

Strange wrote:I had LR 1 - 26 LR2- 24 LR3 - 26... which one was exp?



???

I had two LR and they were 25 and 26.

User avatar
Strange
Posts: 741
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby Strange » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:31 pm

Diiizzzzoooo wrote:
Strange wrote:I had LR 1 - 26 LR2- 24 LR3 - 26... which one was exp?



???

I had two LR and they were 25 and 26.



I could have sworn I had 26 24 and 26... maybe I'm remembering it wrong.

FarewellLsat
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:47 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby FarewellLsat » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:53 pm

Maybe I'm a bit odd...I think the longer LR section was easier. But maybe I was just very happy to be almost done with the stupid test...or just had really bad nerves in the beginning to be objective.

User avatar
cnyltiak
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby cnyltiak » Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:12 pm

Thought it was pretty easy, the 2nd one was my last section though and the last 3-4 questions I just couldn't focus on so we'll see.

Giraffe
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby Giraffe » Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:25 am

cvntstscrty wrote:LSAC’s “Instructions for the Day of the Test” state: “Legal action may be taken against anyone who removes test materials and/or reproduces test material in any way, or shares LSAT test content prior to LSAC’s disclosure of that test.” This includes specific question content from the unscored section of the test. Please refrain from further discussion of ALL June 2011 LSAT questions.

Caveon Test Security is a test security vendor for LSAC.




Holy F*CK! We got it! but GUESS WAT? We ALL have been discussing the damn test on all the possible and impossible boards, PMs, and in the chat rooms. We even had a fucking conference call just an hour ago. EVERYONE who is on this board was present! then, like all of the above wasnt enough we had a video conference meet-and-confer where it was decided to have a meet-and-greet-June-2011-LSAT orgy this Wed, at 2:45:33 pm in Cockaigne with afterparty in Valhalla (go google it!) Complimentary condoms, lsat handouts and drinks! RSVP

We will send you a post card.

User avatar
chasy_price
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:09 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby chasy_price » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:17 am

LR-LG-LR-LR-RC here

RC BOMED.

I had a bit rush over the 2 LRs. I keep getting lost in time.

Anyway RC was just awful.

User avatar
pkrtbx
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:11 am

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby pkrtbx » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:52 am

easyHARD

mooseman2216
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:21 am

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby mooseman2216 » Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:30 am

cnyltiak wrote:Thought it was pretty easy, the 2nd one was my last section though and the last 3-4 questions I just couldn't focus on so we'll see.


word. i was so happy to be turning my book to the last page of the test..... and then i saw a wall of words. it was sad.

whipy
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:02 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby whipy » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:10 pm

Diiizzzzoooo wrote:
Strange wrote:I had LR 1 - 26 LR2- 24 LR3 - 26... which one was exp?



???

I had two LR and they were 25 and 26.


Anyone know for sure which was experimental? Any key words were in the experimental LR that would help to identify it?

Actually, if someone who had just 2xLR would post key words from any questions (nothing illegal, just subject hints) from those two we could identify the experimental by elimination. Chopin has been bandied around so much that it is clear that this was the REAL RC, but nothing that helps to identify the 2 real LR sections.... I don't remember how many Qs in each of 3 LR sections so I cannot even use that to narrow it down to 2 of them. I've seen 'the cop question' mentioned on a few posts, but nothing else.

User avatar
seancris
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:10 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby seancris » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:29 pm

pkrtbx wrote:easyHARD


This.

User avatar
cnyltiak
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:22 pm

Re: June 2011 LR

Postby cnyltiak » Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:38 pm

mooseman2216 wrote:
cnyltiak wrote:Thought it was pretty easy, the 2nd one was my last section though and the last 3-4 questions I just couldn't focus on so we'll see.


word. i was so happy to be turning my book to the last page of the test..... and then i saw a wall of words. it was sad.


yes my fatigue was definitely compounded by the fact that the last page of questions/answers were much longer than previous ones had been... I think it was intentional on LSACs part and I hate them for this.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: latetothis, maybeman, Tazewell, Walliums, Yahoo [Bot] and 15 guests