Does LSAC factor in WHICH experimental you get? Forum

[jortiz682]

I'm sure the answer is probably no, but there's a big difference between, say, an RC experimental that puts you RC-LR-RC-LG-LR vs say...RC-LG-LR-LG-LR. I'd greatly prefer the latter, and even in testing myself I find that 3 RC's or LR's in a row tends to cause slightly lower scores by the 3rd section. Seems like something they could obviously account for, but probably don't.

[Bildungsroman]

No they don't account for it when determining your score.

[Kabuo]

I'm sure the answer is probably no, but there's a big difference between, say, an RC experimental that puts you RC-LR-RC-LG-LR vs say...RC-LG-LR-LG-LR. I'd greatly prefer the latter, and even in testing myself I find that 3 RC's or LR's in a row tends to cause slightly lower scores by the 3rd section. Seems like something they could obviously account for, but probably don't.

I took the LSAT 3 times and got 3 LR sections each one =\. I wanted an experimental games so bad.

[lakers3peat]

experimental games aren't all that they are hyped up to be. i normally finish almost all 4 in the elapsed time but on my experimental ones in December, i barely got through the 3rd game.. it was pretty frustrating because you gauge your performance based on the games and I thought i was for sure screwed until I saw that second games section come 5th and knew the first one was experimental.. I had a hunch either way because they were friggin hard.

[incompetentia]

In a perfect world, you wouldn't metagame the test at all, and trying to determine 1/3 LR vs 1/2 RC/LG wouldn't make any difference.

80% of the test is half psychological, you know

[phx]

In a perfect world, you wouldn't metagame the test at all, and trying to determine 1/3 LR vs 1/2 RC/LG wouldn't make any difference.

80% of the test is half psychological, you know

And 60% of the time this method works every time.

[FantasticMrFox]

I'd prefer RC over LR experimentals