Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

secretad
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:26 pm

Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Postby secretad » Mon May 23, 2011 12:22 pm

When faced with rule equivalency questions, I usually go back through my hypotheticals (usually 3-4) and see that those rules in the answer choices would violate themselves in those scenarios. And one answer choice does not, and that is the one I pick.

Am I missing something here or isn't that the easiest way to do it?

User avatar
suspicious android
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Postby suspicious android » Mon May 23, 2011 1:04 pm

It's a good method, but frequently will leave more than one answer choice.

secretad
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:26 pm

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Postby secretad » Mon May 23, 2011 1:08 pm

What's the best way after you have eliminated 2-3 of the possible answers?

User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Postby soj » Mon May 23, 2011 6:25 pm

This might help.

tomwatts
Posts: 1551
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Postby tomwatts » Mon May 23, 2011 7:18 pm

Also the topics linked from here.

Manhattan LSAT Noah
Posts: 746
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:43 am

Re: Rule Equivalency question..isn't this a good way to attack?

Postby Manhattan LSAT Noah » Wed May 25, 2011 12:45 pm

we have a paper on our site about this question type.

If you can't find it under lsat resources, pm me and I'll shoot you the link.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests