Conclusion? P31-s3-Q16

wanderlust
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:02 pm

Conclusion? P31-s3-Q16

Postby wanderlust » Sat Apr 23, 2011 3:21 am

Could anyone please help me with the conclusion of this argument?
At first, I thought the ethicist's conclusion is the second sentence. But the correct answer choice seems to imply that the ethicist' point is "it's not enough to ban cloning on the ground of vanity" - which is not explicitly stated in the ethicist's argument?
does this mean sometime the argument's conclusion can be implicit?
Thanks!!

wanderlust
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:02 pm

Re: Conclusion? P31-s3-Q16

Postby wanderlust » Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:20 am

up

User avatar
suspicious android
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Conclusion? P31-s3-Q16

Postby suspicious android » Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:06 am

Yeah, the conclusion here is implicit, I'd basically phrase it as "the people who want to ban cloning are wrong."




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], GioChanturia and 14 guests