Barron's LSAT Prep Book

zpetrov
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:19 am

Barron's LSAT Prep Book

Postby zpetrov » Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:50 pm

This is strictly my opinion, but what a load of bollocks this thing is. I bought it a year ago and still go back to it from time to time when my other prep books aren't around. Their practice questions are frustratingly inconsistent. A lot of them are too easy. Others are too... messed up. It seems like one out of every 20 practice questions violates some of the most basic foundations of real LSAT questions (i.e. answer goes way beyond the scope of the question, "must-be-true" questions answered with answers that are definitively not always true, etc.). It's annoying.

But most of all: the explanations for the answers are just terrible. Usually the explanation elaborates with literally three or four words on why the correct answer makes sense, and it says something along the lines of "B, C, D, and E are simply not right" or "A, B, C, and E are clearly not supported by the passage".

How. is. that. helpful?

Rotten.

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Barron's LSAT Prep Book

Postby incompetentia » Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:56 am

This is nothing new

zpetrov
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 12:19 am

Re: Barron's LSAT Prep Book

Postby zpetrov » Sat Apr 16, 2011 7:25 pm

Judging by the last poster's response, people already know that Barron's is miserable, but I just want to bring this example:

"Tom is test driving a blue car. After driving for a short while he comes to the following conclusion: since this car is blue, it must not accelerate quickly.

The foregoing conclusion can be properly drawn if it is also known that:

Correct answer given: all cars that accelerate quickly are red."

NO.

NO!

There is NOTHING in the question stem that implies that only blue and red cars exist. It is absolutely not the case that the answer given is is always true. There are answers that are at least as good as that one.

User avatar
OldTymeyFaceSmasher
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:10 pm

Re: Barron's LSAT Prep Book

Postby OldTymeyFaceSmasher » Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:47 pm

Reading this makes me feel better. I picked the book up because it was small and I can carry it to work, and as a way to sort of "break in" to practicing for the LSAT. I've found it ridiculously confusing, and more than once have been doubting the answers the book says are correct. I guess it's just a piece of shit and I shouldn't bother with it.

User avatar
suspicious android
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Barron's LSAT Prep Book

Postby suspicious android » Sun Apr 17, 2011 8:16 pm

zpetrov wrote:
There is NOTHING in the question stem that implies that only blue and red cars exist. It is absolutely not the case that the answer given is is always true. There are answers that are at least as good as that one.


Actually, that question stem that you quoted means you're not looking for a valid inference, but rather an assumption that is sufficient to make the argument valid. And, if you assume that quick acceleration is sufficient for redness, then blueness would also be enough to infer non-quick acceleration.

Still, I wouldn't use Barron's or any other third party LR or RC material. I've looked over it and there are a lot of terrible questions, it's definitely some of the worst stuff out there.

tomwatts
Posts: 1551
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: Barron's LSAT Prep Book

Postby tomwatts » Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:46 pm

Yeah, what the previous poster said as far as the question's right answer. That answer, while kind of dumb, is correct. But I don't think that you should take any non-LSAC questions as anything more than loose examples intended to illustrate a point anyway. Real practice comes from real questions, not fake ones.

SanDiegoJake
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:17 pm

Re: Barron's LSAT Prep Book

Postby SanDiegoJake » Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:50 pm

Barron's is the worst, by far. If I see a student with a Barron's book, I force the student to throw it away immediately.

cubswin
Posts: 618
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: Barron's LSAT Prep Book

Postby cubswin » Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:53 pm

A few years ago, I saw an Amazon review of Barron's LSAT book that said something like, "It's a good thing that nobody who uses this book will get into law school, because they would sue the hell out of Barron's."




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], retromuse and 3 guests