This is a weaken except. How does D weaken the argument?
I see why E is correct but I don't understand why D is incorrect.
Help! Thanks
PT 24 Section 2. Q 19 Forum
-
Kurst
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:33 pm
Re: PT 24 Section 2. Q 19
Five years ago, in the event of a horrific traffic accident, the people involved had half as many emergency facilities at which they could be treated and possibly saved. Now, people who otherwise would have died in a traffic accident (possibly because there was no emergency facility nearby) could potentially be saved. The number of traffic fatalities may have declined because more people involved in traffic accidents are being saved at emergency facilities.
-
mac35352
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:17 pm
Re: PT 24 Section 2. Q 19
Thank you. I got itKurst wrote:Five years ago, in the event of a horrific traffic accident, the people involved had half as many emergency facilities at which they could be treated and possibly saved. Now, people who otherwise would have died in a traffic accident (possibly because there was no emergency facility nearby) could potentially be saved. The number of traffic fatalities may have declined because more people involved in traffic accidents are being saved at emergency facilities.
