.

poi
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:56 am

.

Postby poi » Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:49 pm

.
Last edited by poi on Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

bmili
Posts: 248
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:21 pm

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby bmili » Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:52 pm

.
Last edited by bmili on Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:58 pm

bmili wrote:why does everyone think the december stained glass LG was so hard? I truly think the Feb 2011 LG section was harder than Dec 2010.


Stained glass was not hard. It was a time vampire. I thought the conferences game though was especially difficult. Did you take it as the real thing?

User avatar
paul34
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby paul34 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:01 pm

...
Last edited by paul34 on Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

poi
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:56 am

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby poi » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:06 pm

SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
bmili wrote:why does everyone think the december stained glass LG was so hard? I truly think the Feb 2011 LG section was harder than Dec 2010.


Stained glass was not hard. It was a time vampire. I thought the conferences game though was especially difficult. Did you take it as the real thing?



Stained glass by itself wasn't too bad, but it was a combination of a lack of diagramming space, stained glass time crunch + conferences difficulty, and the easy game being placed last that made the entire section challenging.

bmili
Posts: 248
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:21 pm

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby bmili » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:09 pm

.
Last edited by bmili on Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

SMG
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:40 pm

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby SMG » Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:18 pm

.
Last edited by SMG on Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

benito
Posts: 321
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:09 pm

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby benito » Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:28 pm

I don't think Feb was close to Dec's difficulty. I do agree that the stained glass game was highly overhyped for its difficulty, it wasn't even the hardest game in the section, but as a whole Feb was much closer to Oct than it was December. And I sat for Feb as a real test and took Dec on my own for practice.

stilles
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:15 am

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby stilles » Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:47 pm

Agree with benito--sat for Oct and Feb and took Dec as a PT; Feb def reminded me of Oct more than Dec in that the difficulty was spread out more or less amongst the sections instead of having one killer section (although I didn't find Dec LG to be that bad).

stuckinmyhead
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 9:25 pm

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby stuckinmyhead » Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:10 pm

I found stained glass to be relatively easy. Took Dec as a PT (strict timing, full test conditions), ran out of time on the section and literally had to do that entire game in 6 min. There were two big deductions to be had which really, really helped. Thought Feb 2011 was a bit more difficult in having more time suck questions, but then again I didn't get any deductions, which probably means I missed them (also possibly means they weren't obvious). FTR, I also found Mulch to be pretty straightforward and easy.

User avatar
YankeesFan
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 8:42 pm

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby YankeesFan » Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:14 pm

June 10 should be intern rape

User avatar
OnlyLivingBoyinNY
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:09 am

Re: unwarranted speculation

Postby OnlyLivingBoyinNY » Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:07 pm

I am just going to pretend like I didn't read OP's and above poster's comments on the June '11 test. That's my new, official study plan.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: earldasquirel, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests