Just wondering.... as todays LSAT was a blur
I had two LGs (LG LR RC LG LR) on my test, how do you know that the first was experimental? Is the experimental always in the first 3 sections? I'm trying to remember the specifics of the games to compare with other posted experiences but I can't remember
Is experimental always early? Forum
- holdencaulfield
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:12 pm
Re: Is experimental always early?
No. Experimental is not always early.
- Stonewall
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:19 am
Re: Is experimental always early?
Your first section was experimental.
/thread.
Edit: ^ which pt wasn't first three?
/thread.
Edit: ^ which pt wasn't first three?
-
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm
Re: Is experimental always early?
None.Stonewall wrote:Your first section was experimental.
/thread.
Edit: ^ which pt wasn't first three?
- northwood
- Posts: 5036
- Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: Is experimental always early?
exp is always in the first 3 sections.
if you have lg or Rc alone inthe first 3, then again after the break- the first LG or RC is exp, no matter where it falls.
the tricky part is when you have 2 LR or LG or RC sections within the first 3. one of those will be the exp, but its harder to tell which one.
if you have lg or Rc alone inthe first 3, then again after the break- the first LG or RC is exp, no matter where it falls.
the tricky part is when you have 2 LR or LG or RC sections within the first 3. one of those will be the exp, but its harder to tell which one.
- Stonewall
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:19 am
Re: Is experimental always early?
that's what I thoughtSchopenhauerFTW wrote:None.Stonewall wrote:Your first section was experimental.
/thread.
Edit: ^ which pt wasn't first three?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login