Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

User avatar
EvanC
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:58 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby EvanC » Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:08 am

I took December and got a 159 and was pissed. Did much better this time and guess on SERIOUSLY about 10-12 fewer questions. December was the worst for a first timer in the middle of exams. I was taking 18 hours and had exams every day leading up to the LSAT and one day afterward.

This time I finished everything 2-7 minutes early except the LG which I got about halfway through on the last game - maybe a little more, and I filled in E on the last question of games 2 and 3. I'm expecting anywhere from low 160s to 170 (reach).

motiontodismiss
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby motiontodismiss » Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:37 am

I had a whopping bronchitis to go with my LSAT. That royally sucked.

alexdough
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:45 am

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby alexdough » Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:10 am

So did the real LG section have the paintings game? That's the only game that I remember- had to blindly guess on three questions because I ran out of time. And I usually finish the games with time to spare...

On a lighter note, I am seriously impressed with people's ability to remember the test. I automatically blocked it all out as soon as I walked out of the building.

User avatar
suspicious android
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby suspicious android » Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:11 am

cities, snow plows, paintings, movies

User avatar
taoist
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:12 am

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby taoist » Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:32 am

RC, LG, LR, LG, LR here.

Yep, that was the real LG. Seemed somewhat easy - at least the paintings and movies games anyway. The two LR sections weren't bad either.

If anything threw me it was RC. I took PrepTests 57 (Dec. 2008) through 62 (Dec. 2010) and never had an RC section like that - caught me off guard (damn you UNESCO!) Kept mixing up descriptivists and prescriptivists in the language passage too :? Was really hoping section 4 or 5 would be another RC, but alas.

On the bright side, I completely destroyed the writing sample :roll:

bmili
Posts: 248
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:21 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby bmili » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:02 am

.
Last edited by bmili on Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

kcdc
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby kcdc » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:17 am

brito11 wrote:First time poster, need to destress after test.

I ended up with RC, LR, RC, LG, LR.

The 1st RC was experimental - the only thing I can remember from it was the African American comic strip artist.

Err...I remember a passage about chemistry and its relation to physics. Dunno which section.

RC is my strong point - and I think they were quite easy in this one. Course I could be wrong lol.

LR - no clue.

LG - didn't even get to the last one. Did guess and check for the snow plow definitely. Froo all of them actually. :)

Didn't sleep well the night before and that didn't help for the LG. Can anyone give a general impressions of the last LG game - easy or hard? Easier than the snow plow one?

Honestly, I felt all the LG was HARD but then LG is not my butter and bread. And I was burned out. :)


LG are my bread and butter, and I thought these were awful. Granted, I was having back-to-back panic attacks the whole time, but I still usually get 100%.

I feel like I missed the tricks for all of them. Plows and cities I got but took too long, so between paintings and films I had to guess on 3. Ugh.

User avatar
Pitcher
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:44 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby Pitcher » Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:54 pm

On the lighter side: Trip one or Trip two?

User avatar
kulshan
Posts: 413
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:59 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby kulshan » Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:26 pm

.
Last edited by kulshan on Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

wolfpack37
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby wolfpack37 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:48 pm

kulshan wrote:Trip two all the way.


TRIP ONE!!! send that peak TWICE!

User avatar
applepiecrust
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby applepiecrust » Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:55 pm

wolfpack37 wrote:
kulshan wrote:Trip two all the way.


TRIP ONE!!! send that peak TWICE!

Trip 2, trip 2, trip 2.

User avatar
Pleasye
Posts: 7970
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby Pleasye » Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:05 pm

Pitcher wrote:On the lighter side: Trip one or Trip two?

2. I was so brain dead by that time that instead of making it easy on myself and calling it trip two I said "the first trip" and "the second trip" the whole time. I also hated LSAC the whole time for not giving them names.

User avatar
applepiecrust
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:38 am

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby applepiecrust » Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:19 pm

Pleasye wrote:
Pitcher wrote:On the lighter side: Trip one or Trip two?

edited out


Agreed. I almost thought of making up names. But then didn't. And probably actually wrote a coherent ~700 word essay.
Last edited by applepiecrust on Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
suspicious android
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby suspicious android » Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:21 pm

I don't want to offend anyone here, so I'll just shut up.
Last edited by suspicious android on Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

wolfpack37
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby wolfpack37 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:25 pm

suspicious android wrote:edited out android also


edited.
Last edited by wolfpack37 on Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
suspicious android
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby suspicious android » Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:30 pm

Hungover this morning, too much post-LSAT celebration.
Last edited by suspicious android on Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby Bildungsroman » Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:33 pm

Pretty sure this writing sample specificity is a road to bannedville. I'd recommend against it.

wolfpack37
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:09 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby wolfpack37 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:33 pm

I CLEVER!

Derp

User avatar
paul34
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby paul34 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:01 pm

...
Last edited by paul34 on Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:03 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23652
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby chup » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:04 pm

Image

1234543523

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby 1234543523 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:05 pm

chup wrote:Image


Sup?

User avatar
paul34
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby paul34 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:08 pm

...
Last edited by paul34 on Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23652
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby chup » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:10 pm

paul34 wrote:
chup wrote:Image


Am I being sent to the Ministry again? My legs are tired from last time.

Nah you're fine. It was directed at the edited posts above yours. They were quick enough to save themselves from the banhammer, but not from my withering looks of disapproval.

User avatar
Pleasye
Posts: 7970
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:22 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby Pleasye » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:33 pm

chup wrote:Nah you're fine. It was directed at the edited posts above yours. They were quick enough to save themselves from the banhammer, but not from my withering looks of disapproval.

Was my reference to the writing sample too specific? I'll edit if it is.

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23652
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Feb 2011 LSAT afterparty thread

Postby chup » Sun Feb 13, 2011 4:39 pm

Pleasye wrote:
chup wrote:Nah you're fine. It was directed at the edited posts above yours. They were quick enough to save themselves from the banhammer, but not from my withering looks of disapproval.

Was my reference to the writing sample too specific? I'll edit if it is.

I think you're OK.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest