Question 18 from PT 12 Section 1

zakohl
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:05 pm

Question 18 from PT 12 Section 1

Postby zakohl » Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:43 am

edit
Last edited by zakohl on Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Kurst
Posts: 448
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:33 pm

Re: Question 18 from PT 12 Section 1

Postby Kurst » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:10 pm

Edit your post: verbatim reproduction of LSAT stimuli is prohibited.

Erik admits lightning causes some damage, but insists that preventing such damage is pointless. If the installation of lightning rods can prevent lightning damage, such installation is not pointless. Erik does not demonstrate that the installation of lightning rods would be pointless. That is A in a nutshell. B confuses Erik's actual conclusion (Frieda's recommendation is pointless) with one supplied by the reader (e.g. faulty wiring and overloaded circuits must be addressed).




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, Evelyn2016, Google [Bot] and 4 guests