NVM

User avatar
voltage88
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: NVM

Postby voltage88 » Sun Dec 26, 2010 1:08 pm

Someone did a retake on a 120 and scored a....120? HAHAHA

anonymiB
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 8:49 pm

Re: NVM

Postby anonymiB » Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:01 pm

voltage88 wrote:Someone did a retake on a 120 and scored a....120? HAHAHA


But on the other hand, someone with a 140 scored a 170 something. GJ!

User avatar
robotclubmember
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:53 am

Re: NVM

Postby robotclubmember » Sun Dec 26, 2010 4:06 pm

artichoke wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:
Attorney wrote:
artichoke wrote:Lol, says the person with 170 posts.

Irony fail

Cognition fail.


Not to give new life to this thread but.... +1


*shrug*

i do lurk a lot more than i post, so what? the search function function does a great job answering most of my questions, and most of OP's questions if he used it. sorry that i don't have 2,000+ posts of me saying +1 to other people to gain their validation, lol. maybe i should quit my job and do that, as quantity of posts = bigger e-penis.

User avatar
artichoke
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm

Re: NVM

Postby artichoke » Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:09 pm

robotclubmember wrote:
*shrug*

i do lurk a lot more than i post, so what? the search function function does a great job answering most of my questions, and most of OP's questions if he used it. sorry that i don't have 2,000+ posts of me saying +1 to other people to gain their validation, lol. maybe i should quit my job and do that, as quantity of posts = bigger e-penis.


...

User avatar
artichoke
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm

Re: NVM

Postby artichoke » Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:09 pm

robotclubmember wrote:*shrug*

i do lurk a lot more than i post, so what? the search function function does a great job answering most of my questions, and most of OP's questions if he used it. sorry that i don't have 2,000+ posts of me saying +1 to other people to gain their validation, lol. maybe i should quit my job and do that, as quantity of posts = bigger e-penis.


Also, I resent the male chauvinism intrinsic in that comment.

User avatar
Lawquacious
Posts: 2037
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:36 am

Re: NVM

Postby Lawquacious » Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:15 pm

I know it was mentioned once before, but I just want to say: it is messed up that someone with a 179 and someone with a 178 retook and scored in the 160s. I guess they were probably retaking on bets? Or maybe they had taken it a long time ago fresh out of UG and weren't as sharp or practiced when they retook? In any case, I just found that pretty surprising and a good reminder that there can be a fairly considerable margin of error in terms of who scores what.

User avatar
Attorney
Posts: 332
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:52 am

Re: NVM

Postby Attorney » Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:38 pm

robotclubmember wrote:*shrug*

i do lurk a lot more than i post, so what? the search function function does a great job answering most of my questions, and most of OP's questions if he used it. sorry that i don't have 2,000+ posts of me saying +1 to other people to gain their validation, lol. maybe i should quit my job and do that, as quantity of posts = bigger e-penis.

+1

User avatar
Attorney
Posts: 332
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:52 am

Re: NVM

Postby Attorney » Sun Dec 26, 2010 8:50 pm

voltage88 wrote:Someone did a retake on a 120 and scored a....120? HAHAHA

Thanks for laughing at me, fancy pants. I suppose you did sooooooo much better, huh?

User avatar
robotclubmember
Posts: 743
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:53 am

Re: NVM

Postby robotclubmember » Sun Dec 26, 2010 9:09 pm

artichoke wrote:
robotclubmember wrote:*shrug*

i do lurk a lot more than i post, so what? the search function function does a great job answering most of my questions, and most of OP's questions if he used it. sorry that i don't have 2,000+ posts of me saying +1 to other people to gain their validation, lol. maybe i should quit my job and do that, as quantity of posts = bigger e-penis.


Also, I resent the male chauvinism intrinsic in that comment.


I apologize to women.

Seriously, though, my only intent was trying to prevent this OP from creating more useless threads where he doesn't know what he is talking about like this: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=142168




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests