LR RC LR LR LG

bigkahuna2020
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:12 am

LR RC LR LR LG

Postby bigkahuna2020 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:57 am

I did the math and the first had to be experimental unless it was a 102 question exam.

It isn't a 102 question exam is it---this is just a TLS collective hallucination correct?

User avatar
KevinP
Posts: 1324
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm

Re: LR RC LR LR LG

Postby KevinP » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:58 am

It is a 102-question exam. Yes, I wish the first section was experimental also :(

bigkahuna2020
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:12 am

Re: LR RC LR LR LG

Postby bigkahuna2020 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:03 am

My math said the first was experimental. I had LR26 RC27 LR25 LR26 LG23 (I think, pretty wasted right now NYC SANTACON 2010 bitches!!!!!)

I dunno, maybe it was 102 but I really really doubt it

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: LR RC LR LR LG

Postby bartleby » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:06 am

bigkahuna2020 wrote:My math said the first was experimental. I had LR26 RC27 LR25 LR26 LG23 (I think, pretty wasted right now NYC SANTACON 2010 bitches!!!!!)

I dunno, maybe it was 102 but I really really doubt it


Circular reasoning?

bigkahuna2020
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:12 am

Re: LR RC LR LR LG

Postby bigkahuna2020 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:08 am

bartleby wrote:
bigkahuna2020 wrote:My math said the first was experimental. I had LR26 RC27 LR25 LR26 LG23 (I think, pretty wasted right now NYC SANTACON 2010 bitches!!!!!)

I dunno, maybe it was 102 but I really really doubt it


Circular reasoning?


More like the fact that out of 60+ LSATS there has never been one. This seems like the same freakout after my last LSATs




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 7 guests