12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

NYCcops
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:56 pm

12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby NYCcops » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:23 pm

Did anybody else get an experimental LR in section 4? Yes or no.

I believe I did and I would love to know if anybody else did. I do not want to hijack anyone elses thread so I am making this one.

LawPlz
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby LawPlz » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:25 pm

edited: I meant the third

Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the third
Last edited by LawPlz on Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.

NYCcops
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:56 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby NYCcops » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:26 pm

thanks. I believe I fucked up. I convinced myself the 4th section was experimental while I was taking it and didn't fully concentrate. The questions were so weird. Goldfish mating and shit. Tons of questions that don't fit the traditional mold of LR. oh well. there is always february.

User avatar
m1 a1
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:15 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby m1 a1 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:53 pm

I had 3 LR sections and I don't remember anything regard goldfish to be honest.

lsatextreme
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:18 am

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby lsatextreme » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:55 pm

someone correct me if i'm wrong, but i believe every single experimental thus far has been in the first 3 sections, so unless they decided to change it up this year, i can't see how you'd have a section 4 experimental anything

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: .

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:57 pm

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

NYCcops
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:56 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby NYCcops » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:58 pm

LR
RC
LR
LR
LG

12/11/10- Satan's LSAT

LawPlz
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby LawPlz » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:00 pm

SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.


What was your test distribution?

LR RC LR LR LG


shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess :(

lsatextreme
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 2:18 am

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby lsatextreme » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:05 pm

LawPlz wrote:
SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.


What was your test distribution?

LR RC LR LR LG


shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess :(

i have a feeling you and i had the same setup, from what i gathered, there's actually 2 different forms that had LR RC LR LR LG, and the one i had the section 3 LR had 25 questions only (which i believe is the experimental). I too had thought I did considerably worse on the section 1 LR and prayed that it was the experimental, but everyone else who didn't have an LR experimental has said the 2 LR's had 26 questions, so...yea there it is

LawPlz
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby LawPlz » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:10 pm

lsatextreme wrote:
LawPlz wrote:
SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
LawPlz wrote:Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the first.


What was your test distribution?

LR RC LR LR LG


shit sorry, I meant my experimental was the 3rd LR. I wish it was the first, just wishful thinking on my part I guess :(

i have a feeling you and i had the same setup, from what i gathered, there's actually 2 different forms that had LR RC LR LR LG, and the one i had the section 3 LR had 25 questions only (which i believe is the experimental). I too had thought I did considerably worse on the section 1 LR and prayed that it was the experimental, but everyone else who didn't have an LR experimental has said the 2 LR's had 26 questions, so...yea there it is

Yeah, the third LR I had only had 25 questions. I thought for sure that meant the first LR was experimental since it had 26 questions (making the test total 102), but I was wrong since both LRs were apparently out of 26.

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: .

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:11 pm

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

NYCcops
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:56 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby NYCcops » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:12 pm

You're awesome. Thank you for clarifying this!

User avatar
2011L1
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:33 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby 2011L1 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:13 pm

LawPlz wrote:edited: I meant the third

Had 3 LRs, and my experimental was the third


did you have rc-lr-lr-lg-lr?

User avatar
m1 a1
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:15 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby m1 a1 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:34 pm

SchopenhauerFTW wrote:Yep.

LR - 26
RC - 27
LR - 25
LR - 26
LG - 23

It was a 102 question test.

Section 3 (2nd LR) was the experimental in this distribution.


Ouch that hurts. I thought the LR experimental was really easy, and I didn't do as well on the 1st LR.

liltay357
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:59 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby liltay357 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:27 am

I had the same setup except all 3 of my LR sections had 26 questions. Is the :evil: mad at me? lol

LR-26
RC-27
LR-26
LR-26
LG-23

Anyone else have this set up. I cant really remember specific ?'s from the LR didnt find any of the especially odd but I do feel better about the last 2.

Help! :!:

User avatar
Neidermeyer519
Posts: 244
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:20 am

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby Neidermeyer519 » Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:04 am

I had the same setup and distinctly remember the first being the hardest. Something about it felt off, so I'm hoping that is my subconscience telling me it was the experimental. lol.

User avatar
gmenfan
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby gmenfan » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:59 am

I had the 3x26 as well, and from what I've read, it seems like the 2nd was experi :(.

SomeoneInTheSameBoat
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:40 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby SomeoneInTheSameBoat » Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:43 pm

I took the same LSAT and my exp. section was section 1 (which was LR).

I had the same set-up as most people on this blog (with three LR sections) but If I counted my first section, I ended up with 103 questions as opposed to 102.

I am pretty sure the first section was the experiment; it was also the hardest.

User avatar
Jader
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:24 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby Jader » Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:13 pm

LR RC LR (exp) LR LG; all LR 26 questions, 100% sure.

I didn't know the experimental was before the break and I didn't know I had another LR section, but I was confident that my third section was experimental like 15 questions in. It just seemed completely out of order and obscenely difficult.

User avatar
AnthonyNicator
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby AnthonyNicator » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:26 pm

how are you certain that the third (26) was the experimental, and not the first (25) which would give us 101?

ren2011
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:06 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby ren2011 » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:59 pm

It seems to have been pretty well confirmed that the # of questions is 102. I had 3 LRs as well, and they were all 26 questions, so 102 has to be the total.

cowgirl_bebop
Posts: 901
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: 12/11/10 LSAT.. simple question regarding experimental LR

Postby cowgirl_bebop » Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:48 am

I had

LR
RC
LR
LR
LG

The first LR was rough. The second one was ok, but the third one I believe I mastered. I was REALLY hoping that the 1st one was experimental.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kindofcanuck and 7 guests