Benjamin J wrote:I didn't manage anything quite like that as a response, but since they didn't specify if the kid was a boy or girl, instead of referring to the child as Mr./Mrs. Wang's son or daughter, I just referred to it as "the little Wang." Must've written "because this would be most beneficial for the little Wang" half a dozen times.
I really needed something to smile about after getting blindsided by a second, and rather painful section of logic games after the break.
I also referenced "the little Wang," several times and can admit that I also chortled upon first reading the scenario. Of all the names, LSAC had to pick "Wang" and not give the child a sex or a name? Really?
And yeah, that LG was tough. I'm now fairly sure I missed every single question on conferences except for the first one. Think I did well on the first one, last one, and decent on stained glass, so we'll see. But yeah... ouch.