The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

User avatar
akili
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby akili » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:49 am

Rawlberto wrote:The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.


Mulch is from June.

The Truth
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:07 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby The Truth » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:53 am

say UHHHHHHH.....nah nah nah nahhhhh

BlueDiamond
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby BlueDiamond » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:55 am

akili wrote:
Rawlberto wrote:The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.


Mulch is from June.


Poster knows that... they are saying people thought mulch was hard.. but that mulch was nothing compared to the games from Dec 10

User avatar
akili
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby akili » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:57 am

BlueDiamond wrote:
akili wrote:
Rawlberto wrote:The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.


Mulch is from June.


Poster knows that... they are saying people thought mulch was hard.. but that mulch was nothing compared to the games from Dec 10


My bad, I thought when he said compensate he/she meant LSAC were compensating for October games being a joke (and mulch being one of them)

BlueDiamond
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby BlueDiamond » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:59 am

akili wrote:
BlueDiamond wrote:
akili wrote:
Rawlberto wrote:The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.


Mulch is from June.


Poster knows that... they are saying people thought mulch was hard.. but that mulch was nothing compared to the games from Dec 10


My bad, I thought when he said compensate he/she meant LSAC were compensating for October games being a joke (and mulch being one of them)


I'm actually just more assuming he knows that than anything.. you could still be right haha

User avatar
Cmoss
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Cmoss » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:18 am

SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
Cmoss wrote:
ccmbr006 wrote:I had LR RC LR LR LG

Well, when I first finished it, I spent the first five minutes of the writing sample staring at my desk. I had rocked the other sections, and I was utterly confused as to how the LG was so shitty.

Then I thought of the different Dante-esque torments that await the LSAC employees in hell.

And then, I felt pretty good when I realized that everyone thought LG sucked.

But I learned that the LR that I had bombed thinking it was the experimental was real.

And that sucked.


+1

Please I hope the first LR is the experimental


It was the third section.


How do you figure

biladtreasure2
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:45 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby biladtreasure2 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:20 am

nathan. wrote:
freon wrote:leave the one I'm with


start a new relationship wit' chuuu



This is what you do.

User avatar
KevinP
Posts: 1324
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby KevinP » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:29 am

Let me put it to you this way what the December LG section made me want to do. If LSAC was an annoying dog and I was a ninja cat:

--ImageRemoved--

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: .

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:33 am

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
vissidarte27
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:43 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby vissidarte27 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:44 am

Disclaimer: I didn't take December 2010. I'm taking the LSAT for the first time in February (and my GOD have these post-LSAT threads terrified me), but I feel like the following link is appropriate:

http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/02/boyfriend-doesnt-have-ebola-probably.html

For those who don't feel like clicking, a couple of pics:
Image
Image

The pain caused by LG was too serious for numbers?

chopper
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:43 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby chopper » Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:57 am

It made me say "there's always the GMATs."

Side note, I dominated my first LG section, which I found out later was the one that is not scored.

Anomaly
Posts: 151
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Anomaly » Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:58 am

yeayea we all "aced" our experimental right?

chopper
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:43 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby chopper » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:07 am

Anomaly wrote:yeayea we all "aced" our experimental right?


Haha.

I'm serious though. I thought it was the real one since it was just as difficult as all the practices I've taken.

User avatar
Aro5389
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:35 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Aro5389 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:53 am

chopper wrote:It made me say "there's always the GMATs."

Side note, I dominated my first LG section, which I found out later was the one that is not scored.

As did I, in which immediatly flipping to Section 4 after break I just merely looked at Game 1 and said FFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.


Nonetheless, I completed it, got to stain glass windows, literally said "something is wrong here", flipped to the last game, did it in like 5 minutes, and then attempted Game 3 while trying to figure out damn stained glass windows.


Then I cried like OP during writing. I must say I found the writing section kind of funny despite sadness.

paraclete11
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:09 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby paraclete11 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:55 am

RC-LR-LG-LG-LR... Crushed the first set of logic games. Came back from the break to open section 4 to see more. Secton 4 I Completed two games accurately, the third game which was the stained glass game and the last which was an fairly easy sequencing game. Kind of uncertain about the first two games as I was in shock from having another section og LG :shock: . Considering what past test takers have indicated section3 is expiremental and that blows being that I completed all 4 games. Sucks to have one section screw you :evil:

Sandro
Posts: 2526
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Sandro » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:57 am

my LG score is going to come down to in large amount semi educated guesses on Stained Glass/Conferences. I feel i was able to fire off some decent guesses on 4 or so questions, using a combination of the rules/shying away from AC's that seemed not to be possible to be correct.

ss12389
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:38 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby ss12389 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:40 pm

Definitely cry during the writing sample. Definitely seriously consider med school.

User avatar
Cmoss
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Cmoss » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:00 pm

SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
Cmoss wrote:
SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
Cmoss wrote:
+1

Please I hope the first LR is the experimental


It was the third section.


How do you figure


Unless the number of questions for each section were different. If the second LR (3rd section) had 25 questions, then it was experimental.


now i want to cry

Tullstone
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:00 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Tullstone » Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:07 pm

SageD wrote:The kid was 10 for me, too.

I wrote 750-1000 words about why the Wangs would best be served by driving their child out into the woods, and leaving him/her there, armed only with a one-gallon Ziploc bag filled with approved supplies, an analog wrist watch, and a snack, to survive in the wilderness and fight off bears.

a) Accommodating to the Wangs' work schedule? Check.
b) Providing the Wangs' child with a variety of experiences not found in the traditional school setting? Check.
c) Approximating for the Wangs' child how I felt taking the December '10 LSAT logic games section? Check.



ahahahh!!!! YESSS!!!

Benjamin J
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:18 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Benjamin J » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:25 pm

Tullstone wrote:
SageD wrote:The kid was 10 for me, too.

I wrote 750-1000 words about why the Wangs would best be served by driving their child out into the woods, and leaving him/her there, armed only with a one-gallon Ziploc bag filled with approved supplies, an analog wrist watch, and a snack, to survive in the wilderness and fight off bears.

a) Accommodating to the Wangs' work schedule? Check.
b) Providing the Wangs' child with a variety of experiences not found in the traditional school setting? Check.
c) Approximating for the Wangs' child how I felt taking the December '10 LSAT logic games section? Check.



ahahahh!!!! YESSS!!!



I didn't manage anything quite like that as a response, but since they didn't specify if the kid was a boy or girl, instead of referring to the child as Mr./Mrs. Wang's son or daughter, I just referred to it as "the little Wang." Must've written "because this would be most beneficial for the little Wang" half a dozen times.

I really needed something to smile about after getting blindsided by a second, and rather painful section of logic games after the break.

FakeBlood
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:19 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby FakeBlood » Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:28 pm

cardinals03 wrote:break stained glass windows!


AMEN. +111111111111


poi wrote:made me flip through an MCAT. for reals.

i hear that. the mcat was way easier than the LSAT has been..

Krodizzle wrote:A part of my soul is still dying inside.


+1

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby bartleby » Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:32 pm

I was so bummed after LG, I got tripped up in the writing sample on when to use Wangs' and when to use Wangs. I hope law schools don't check it for grammar.

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: .

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:56 pm

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Sandro
Posts: 2526
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Sandro » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:02 pm

I did much better on the LSAT than I did the GRE...

jerrymander
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:59 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby jerrymander » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:11 pm

Benjamin J wrote:
I didn't manage anything quite like that as a response, but since they didn't specify if the kid was a boy or girl, instead of referring to the child as Mr./Mrs. Wang's son or daughter, I just referred to it as "the little Wang." Must've written "because this would be most beneficial for the little Wang" half a dozen times.

I really needed something to smile about after getting blindsided by a second, and rather painful section of logic games after the break.


+1 epic

Auto-admit Yale for creativity and humor....it takes big balls to write about a little Wang on the LSAT...




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 34iplaw and 11 guests