The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

SageD
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby SageD » Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:59 pm

I became irrationally angry with the proctor after he announced five minutes left (at which point I was already in full-blown panic attack, and was essentially useless for the rest of the test anyway), and when he said that we couldn't leave until after the full writing section was over, I nearly stood up and accused him of false imprisonment.

I didn't, thankfully. But still, every part of my soul wanted to run out of that room, and it's hard to express how annoyed I was having to write about the Wangs and their stupid child care when I was almost positive I was cancelling the test.

korealize
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:34 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby korealize » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:39 pm

wrong thread

Arturo
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Arturo » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:51 pm

ChiCubs14 wrote:
Arturo wrote:
BlueFeathers wrote:
ChiCubs14 wrote:made me think about the GRE

Yep.



I don't get this "think about the GRE," is that because the GRE is suppose to be easier? Sry, i've never opened a GRE book but I may have to consider it after this test. Lol. Leme know, serious Q cuz I don't get this reference ;P



My statement meant that I'm failing at this section in the LSAT and that could cause me potentially not do well on this LSAT test all-together so the GRE might be a better option...The GRE does not have a section similar to LG's so in my case it probably will be easier if I need to take it...


OK, got it. Thanks for the run-down buddy cuz I'm in the same boat as you, deff a hard LG section. We'll see. Wish ya the best of luck, hopefully we did well and neither of us have to take the GRE, but now I know that's an option ;P

Arturo
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Arturo » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:03 pm

/| = Respect LSAC!! = |\
| God save the queen |
Last edited by Arturo on Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:51 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
2014
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby 2014 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:05 pm

Arturo wrote:It was harsh... I'm glad to see others agree because maybe the curve will reflect it.

Anyone actually finish them all w/o guessing on any?

Yeah I did, though I had less than a minute to spare.

Arturo
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Arturo » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:09 pm

/| = Respect LSAC!! = |\
| God save the queen |
Last edited by Arturo on Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Arturo
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Arturo » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:10 pm

I just want January 10 to be here already lol. Oh well... score before new years? Anyone think so?

User avatar
2011L1
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:33 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby 2011L1 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:12 pm

Maybe its me, but I thought the LG's were fair and expected from Oct test. I took June test and mulch game was a nightmare! there were just a bunch of conditionals on the stained glass game. I took Binary solutions in NYC and Eva is a Gem!

smdewart
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:51 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby smdewart » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:19 pm

...take the GMAT. The Critical Reasoning is a piece of friggin' cake after having studied Logical Reasoning for hundreds of hours.

User avatar
joebloe
Posts: 376
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby joebloe » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:24 pm

Longhorn88 wrote:...3) made me want to lobby for tort reform just to get back at the LSAC.


THIS.

User avatar
kkklick
Posts: 1021
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:33 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby kkklick » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:31 pm

3.

biladtreasure2
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:45 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby biladtreasure2 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:33 pm

...wonder why I re-took a 169.

But hey, when years from now young LSATers are talking about that legendarily hard Dec. 10' LG section, we can gloat about it like Andy Rooney on the Great Depression.

SupraVln180
Posts: 883
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:50 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby SupraVln180 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:28 pm

Arturo wrote:
SageD wrote:I didn't, thankfully. But still, every part of my soul wanted to run out of that room, and it's hard to express how annoyed I was having to write about the Wangs and their stupid child care when I was almost positive I was cancelling the test.



F*ck the Wangs, and F*ck their 12 year old child! Haha! jk no dude, most of us bombed that. I blanked man, I guessed on 7-8, full out guesses. 2-3, educated guessed. Unless you were shooting for over a mid 160 I don't think its the end of the world, how many you guess on? We just gotta hope we guessed right buddy. I've had some lucky guesses before and allz I know is I am not retaking that test every again!

Plus, don't forget, they'll likely curve to compensate everyone elses difficulties there. I know it wasn't just me, the moment I left I knew I couldn't have been the only one who struggled that one. It was just difficult, I've taken 50+ PT and that one was really one of the worst. Two extremely hard games in one section. Gotta be some curve to consider.

EDIT: But you better have rocked 1+4



The Wangs kid was 10, not 12. 8)

User avatar
nathan.
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:23 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby nathan. » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:50 pm

freon wrote:leave the one I'm with


start a new relationship wit' chuuu

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: .

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:54 pm

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
joebloe
Posts: 376
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby joebloe » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:58 pm

SchopenhauerFTW wrote:
SupraVln180 wrote:
Arturo wrote:
SageD wrote:I didn't, thankfully. But still, every part of my soul wanted to run out of that room, and it's hard to express how annoyed I was having to write about the Wangs and their stupid child care when I was almost positive I was cancelling the test.



F*ck the Wangs, and F*ck their 12 year old child! Haha! jk no dude, most of us bombed that. I blanked man, I guessed on 7-8, full out guesses. 2-3, educated guessed. Unless you were shooting for over a mid 160 I don't think its the end of the world, how many you guess on? We just gotta hope we guessed right buddy. I've had some lucky guesses before and allz I know is I am not retaking that test every again!

Plus, don't forget, they'll likely curve to compensate everyone elses difficulties there. I know it wasn't just me, the moment I left I knew I couldn't have been the only one who struggled that one. It was just difficult, I've taken 50+ PT and that one was really one of the worst. Two extremely hard games in one section. Gotta be some curve to consider.

EDIT: But you better have rocked 1+4



The Wangs kid was 10, not 12. 8)


Weren't there two kids who were 12 years old? :shock:


Not that I recall. I think you might've been hallucinating during the WS. In at Berkeley.

SageD
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby SageD » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:09 pm

The kid was 10 for me, too.

I wrote 750-1000 words about why the Wangs would best be served by driving their child out into the woods, and leaving him/her there, armed only with a one-gallon Ziploc bag filled with approved supplies, an analog wrist watch, and a snack, to survive in the wilderness and fight off bears.

a) Accommodating to the Wangs' work schedule? Check.
b) Providing the Wangs' child with a variety of experiences not found in the traditional school setting? Check.
c) Approximating for the Wangs' child how I felt taking the December '10 LSAT logic games section? Check.

ATR
Posts: 1119
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby ATR » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:11 pm

Image

LawPlz
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby LawPlz » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:15 pm

atresia wrote:Image

Image

ATR
Posts: 1119
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby ATR » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:18 pm

LawPlz wrote:FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.jpg

Hey, don't look at me. I smashed the window.

User avatar
Rawlberto
Posts: 413
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:43 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Rawlberto » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:24 pm

The October games were a joke. Mulch only tripped me up for a second until I realized I only needed to use one tier. I knew they would compensate, but this was ridiculous.

User avatar
Cmoss
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Cmoss » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:10 am

ccmbr006 wrote:I had LR RC LR LR LG

Well, when I first finished it, I spent the first five minutes of the writing sample staring at my desk. I had rocked the other sections, and I was utterly confused as to how the LG was so shitty.

Then I thought of the different Dante-esque torments that await the LSAC employees in hell.

And then, I felt pretty good when I realized that everyone thought LG sucked.

But I learned that the LR that I had bombed thinking it was the experimental was real.

And that sucked.


+1

Please I hope the first LR is the experimental

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: .

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:33 am

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Arturo
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby Arturo » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:39 am

/| = Respect LSAC!! = |\
| God save the queen |
Last edited by Arturo on Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
hokie
Posts: 339
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:32 am

Re: The December 2010 LG section made me want to...

Postby hokie » Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:48 am

made me want to be like "WTF?? FML." and walk out..........




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 34iplaw, Deardevil, Hi-So - ArshavinFan, Zoidberg747 and 9 guests