ThreeYears wrote: gmenfan wrote:
i know, but i have always PTed around 175 (ridiculous issue on the real thing in oct)...is it unrealistic to hope for a 171 even?
We're in VERY similar boats--170 in Oct and retake today with one craptacular LG section. Part of my feels like I did well enough on RC and LRs to make up for it, but another part would rather have a 170 and a cancel
. I think I'm going to take a few days to think over it.
Exact same situation, exact same thoughts. I think I did phenomenally good on the rest of test, feeling like a -0/-0/-0/-6. Only hope it will turn out to be true.
ditto's. 170 on the june '10, but i retook hoping for at least a 175 to have a shot at georgetown.
really, i don't think i missed many questions at all on the two LRs, and I was especially confident after the RC section.
The breakdown for the LG was 6 - 7 - 5 - 5, and I'm like 98% sure I got the first 13 correct (first section was cake and just plugged and chugged all the way to finish stained glass... like people have said, it wasn't HARD, it was just time consuming).
however, the third set of questions (conferences) really tripped me up. definitely guessed on the last two before switching to the last section with time running out, where i only had time to get the first 3 correct with certainty. all in all, i blindly guessed C for the last 2 questions in each of the last two sections. if even one of those hits, i'll be ecstatic.
so, best case scenario is -3 if i pull the miracle on the LG and somehow didn't miss any on the rest of the test. worst case scenario would probably be like -8 or 9 overall. which, on a 102 question test with such a brutal LG, might still be near a 175.
but yeah. Conferences was WAY harder than stained glass. stained glass was easy.. just really time consuming. which makes it the same as being hard, i guess.