December 2010 Initial Reactions

bee's vision
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:36 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby bee's vision » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:01 pm

I also remember a 25 section lr. The second real one I think

BlueDiamond
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:56 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby BlueDiamond » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:03 pm

If there's a -25 curve I probably got a 170! Let's hope for the best!

vhtlau
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:32 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby vhtlau » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:03 pm

stained glass sucked the most for sure. did anyone remember a q on generalizing rap music etc etc on an experimental LR?? PLEASE LET IT BE THE EXPERIMENTAL SECTION.

User avatar
joebloe
Posts: 376
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby joebloe » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:04 pm

vhtlau wrote:stained glass sucked the most for sure. did anyone remember a q on generalizing rap music etc etc on an experimental LR?? PLEASE LET IT BE THE EXPERIMENTAL SECTION.


Rap was real. Source: myself, with the exp LG. Sorry, bro.

User avatar
Moral_Midgetry
Posts: 543
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby Moral_Midgetry » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:04 pm

vhtlau wrote:stained glass sucked the most for sure. did anyone remember a q on generalizing rap music etc etc on an experimental LR?? PLEASE LET IT BE THE EXPERIMENTAL SECTION.


That was the real deal. Sorry bro.

bee's vision
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:36 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby bee's vision » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:05 pm

Moral_Midgetry wrote:
Cpwilson wrote: Noticing the next page contained a bunch of text thinking RC or LR. Enter Stained Glass and Conference games, hello mediocrity.


Lol. Once I turned the page it took me a couple of seconds to comprehend what I was looking at. LR? no. RC? no. It looks like something from the 1950s.

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: .

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:06 pm

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby bartleby » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:07 pm

Remove, paranoid about that Internet threat.
Last edited by bartleby on Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cpwilson
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 6:39 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby Cpwilson » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:08 pm

no worries bartleby. Things will turn out fine.

User avatar
StrictlyLiable
Posts: 214
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:34 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby StrictlyLiable » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:09 pm

What do you think the 160/165 curve will be?

capnb
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:24 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby capnb » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:09 pm

---
Last edited by capnb on Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bless
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:32 am

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby Bless » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:10 pm

I've taken 2 LSATs.


June 2009 (dinos)
Dec 2010



So all you little pussies stop crying. I got hit with the hard game sections twice. Two for two.

gens1tb
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:36 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby gens1tb » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:11 pm

bartleby wrote:Remove, paranoid about that Internet threat.


that has also caused me to not post in this thread

User avatar
CmonSD
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby CmonSD » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:11 pm

I had RC, LR, LG, LG, LR and got raped on the first LG. (exp I guess?) I vary rarely ever miss a question and I gave up and started filling in bubbles. I was about to walk out. The 2nd with the windows I finished without a problem...We are positive it was the exp with the stagecoach/vault/mirror game?

User avatar
Moral_Midgetry
Posts: 543
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby Moral_Midgetry » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:12 pm

Bless wrote:I've taken 2 LSATs.


June 2009 (dinos)
Dec 2010



So all you little pussies stop crying. I got hit with the hard game sections twice. Two for two.


I resent being called a little pussy.
Last edited by Moral_Midgetry on Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23645
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby chup » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:12 pm

Bless wrote:I've taken 2 LSATs.


June 2009 (dinos)
Dec 2010



So all you little pussies stop crying. I got hit with the hard game sections twice. Two for two.

Thank you for your valuable contribution to this forum.

User avatar
Cpwilson
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 6:39 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby Cpwilson » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:12 pm

CmonSD just leave.

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby bartleby » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:12 pm

Yeah, can we clarify what exactly we can or cannot talk about? We're not talking about specific questions or answers. Can we not say Stars or Game 1 or Game 2 without going into detail?

I understand TLS liability but I'm now unclear about what we can or cannot talk about.

User avatar
joebloe
Posts: 376
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby joebloe » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:13 pm

capnb wrote:This was my third LSAT (153, 160, ???). I know I did better than June, but I'm not sure if I did better than October.

On the real LG section, I finished 2 games, half the 3rd, and just acceptability on the 4th (guessed on the rest). I figure I missed 8-10 on the LG section alone [I did even worse on the experimental LG section]. I figure I missed 4-6 on each LR section and 6-9 on RC. So... I probably missed 22-31 questions.

So I probably got 69%-78% (mean of 73.5%) or, based on the last half dozen LSATs, ranges of (156-159) for 69%, (162-164) for 78% [and (159-161) for the mean of 73.5%]. This LSAT should be around the high end of each range hopefully (or higher).

So I don't know whether to cancel or if it matters one way or another since its my third test. I figure I might as well just let it ride and hope for the best.


I don't think it's gonna matter; if you do worse (or don't do a whole lot better), you're probably only going to be applying to schools that take your highest anyway. Hope you aren't riding a bad GPA like me, bud.

User avatar
CmonSD
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby CmonSD » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:14 pm

Cpwilson wrote:CmonSD just leave.


Ouch?

gens1tb
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:36 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby gens1tb » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:15 pm

bartleby wrote:Yeah, can we clarify what exactly we can or cannot talk about? We're not talking about specific questions or answers. Can we not say Stars or Game 1 or Game 2 without going into detail?

I understand TLS liability but I'm now unclear about what we can or cannot talk about.


the sticky says that's ok but I haven't been here long enough to not be paranoid

User avatar
Moral_Midgetry
Posts: 543
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby Moral_Midgetry » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:16 pm

CmonSD wrote:
Cpwilson wrote:CmonSD just leave.


Ouch?


I think s/he is upset because us losers that have been on this thread since getting out of the test are tired of seeing the same questions that have been throughly answered be asked again, and again, and again.

User avatar
joebloe
Posts: 376
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:02 am

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby joebloe » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:17 pm

So, does anybody have his/her appetite back yet?

I'm thinking steak tartar, just because I don't give a damn anymore if I get some foodborne illness.

User avatar
kwais
Posts: 1683
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby kwais » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:17 pm

I'm sure this has been asked and answered but I'd love a little clarity.
So if the curve is predetermined and for some reason the amount of people they thought would get a certain number of questions right don't, does that mean that the percentiles (97%, 98%...) are meaningless? are they adjusted?

capnb
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:24 pm

Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions

Postby capnb » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:17 pm

joebloe wrote: I don't think it's gonna matter; if you do worse (or don't do a whole lot better), you're probably only going to be applying to schools that take your highest anyway. Hope you aren't riding a bad GPA like me, bud.


probably worse lol




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], kryptik, Rogah and 11 guests