"People Who..." introducing sufficient/Necessary condt

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.

Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:43 am

"People Who..." introducing sufficient/Necessary condt

Postby flannelman » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:35 am

So I recently got a little mixed up over what seemed like (and is) a conditional statement...

"Companies however, rarely H people who are not concerned with the FG that can be obtained by hard work"

And If I understand correctly "People who" is the sufficient condition indicator being shown. I didn't realize initially which part of the statement was S/N. -FG most -H or the other way around. My question is if this is a general principle to count on. x someone who y, and y is your sufficient condition. Are there any hang ups with this? I'm sure if you throw an only in there the who shows the necessary and not the sufficient. Seems like there should be.

Any insight would be much appreciated.


Posts: 428
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:19 pm

Re: "People Who..." introducing sufficient/Necessary condt

Postby tourdeforcex » Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:04 am

sounds good to me.

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 10 guests