PT 43: Atypically easy?

AshtonB
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:59 pm

PT 43: Atypically easy?

Postby AshtonB » Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:38 am

Did anyone else feel that this test was unusually un-challenging, especially the games portion?

User avatar
paulshortys10
Posts: 619
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:03 pm

Re: PT 43: Atypically easy?

Postby paulshortys10 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 5:02 am

I did extremely well in the games...did well on the LR sections too....-8 on RC though....got a 164 :(

2011Law
Posts: 822
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm

Re: PT 43: Atypically easy?

Postby 2011Law » Thu Nov 11, 2010 5:15 am

My success with games really began with 43, where I think they begin to get easier, so yes there. But the other sections I didn't fare as well on, got -9 in RC and ended with a 162 (the lowest of my 10 most recent PTs). So if you did well, I think its probably a sign of good things to come for you (if you keep practicing and reviewing).

User avatar
paulshortys10
Posts: 619
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:03 pm

Re: PT 43: Atypically easy?

Postby paulshortys10 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 5:25 am

2011Law wrote:My success with games really began with 43, where I think they begin to get easier, so yes there. But the other sections I didn't fare as well on, got -9 in RC and ended with a 162 (the lowest of my 10 most recent PTs). So if you did well, I think its probably a sign of good things to come for you (if you keep practicing and reviewing).


Was that RC section terrible or what?

AshtonB
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:59 pm

Re: PT 43: Atypically easy?

Postby AshtonB » Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:21 am

paulshortys10 wrote:I did extremely well in the games...did well on the LR sections too....-8 on RC though....got a 164 :(

Me, too, exactly -8 on the RC. I made up for it in the other sections though, and ended up with a 166. The second LR was particularly breezy.

motiontodismiss
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 pm

Re: PT 43: Atypically easy?

Postby motiontodismiss » Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:32 am

paulshortys10 wrote:I did extremely well in the games...did well on the LR sections too....-8 on RC though....got a 164 :(


That sounds like a horrendous curve, considering "well" in TLS speak usually means lower single digits on each section.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Pozzo and 2 guests