Haven't found a good explanation

mysticdawg
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:03 pm

Haven't found a good explanation

Postby mysticdawg » Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:10 pm

Hey guys,
PT 54 S4 Q21

I haven't found a good explanation why C is the answer. Even on atlastLSAT/manhattanLsat.

Does anyone have a good explanation? Thanks

Woozy
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: Haven't found a good explanation

Postby Woozy » Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:08 pm

A little thought experiment will help demonstrate the way this answer works. Let's say there are two witnesses, A and B. They both witness the crime and remember 50% of the details. Person A is affected by misleading questioning while person B is completely unaffected by the way questions are presented.

Lawyer 1 questions them and tries to phrase his questions in a way which decreases accuracy.
A is affected, gets 20% of the details wrong due to the questioning, so his initial testimony is 30% accurate.
B is unaffected and his testimony is 50% accurate.

Lawyer 2 questions them and tries to phrase his questions in a way which increases accuracy.
A is affected, gets 20% of the details correct due to the questioning, so his testimony in the cross examination is 70% accurate.
B is unaffected and his testimony remains 50% accurate.

So, you can see how B was more accurate initially but less accurate in cross examination because he was less influenced by the nature of the questioning than A.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 7 guests