Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

User avatar
kalede
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:59 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby kalede » Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:58 am

170ish.

User avatar
T6Hopeful
Posts: 693
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:30 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby T6Hopeful » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:02 am

168.
Drunk (maybe if I'm hungover or still drunk I'll won't care as much about a lower score) and praying. Ironic, but whatever works.

User avatar
catsparka
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby catsparka » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:19 am

160.

User avatar
niederbomb
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby niederbomb » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:26 am

166-172

Michigan!

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:41 am

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

JesusChrist
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby JesusChrist » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:43 am

haha I like how JesusChrist is on the same row as DamnLSAT.

Hedwig
Posts: 835
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:56 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Hedwig » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:46 am

Can you actually fail the LSAT? Say you don't get enough right to actually get into percentiles/120? What happens then???

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby incompetentia » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:47 am

I did read about one kid whose raw score was -4. It ended up being 93 scaled.

Hedwig
Posts: 835
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:56 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Hedwig » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:52 am

Your facetiousness simply serves to confuse me. I'm not predicting I got a score in the low 20's raw score or anything (or whatever it is) ... just wondering if maybe you had someone who wasn't getting stuff right very much in the first place, and say they misbubbled a couple sections... it could happen. WHAT THEN.

SchopenhauerFTW
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 pm

Re: .

Postby SchopenhauerFTW » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:55 am

.
Last edited by SchopenhauerFTW on Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby incompetentia » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:05 am

eit wrote:Your facetiousness simply serves to confuse me. I'm not predicting I got a score in the low 20's raw score or anything (or whatever it is) ... just wondering if maybe you had someone who wasn't getting stuff right very much in the first place, and say they misbubbled a couple sections... it could happen. WHAT THEN.

Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about

Hedwig
Posts: 835
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:56 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Hedwig » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:07 am

incompetentia wrote:
eit wrote:Your facetiousness simply serves to confuse me. I'm not predicting I got a score in the low 20's raw score or anything (or whatever it is) ... just wondering if maybe you had someone who wasn't getting stuff right very much in the first place, and say they misbubbled a couple sections... it could happen. WHAT THEN.

Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about


OH makes sense. I was thinking you had to have 15 minimum when I wa slooking at the chart, didn't see it was 0-15.

Well now your facetiousness makes sense.

User avatar
nsideirish
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:32 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby nsideirish » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:10 am

What the hell...170 (pleaseeee a -12 curve or better).

User avatar
Blumpbeef
Posts: 3814
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:17 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Blumpbeef » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:55 am

If you just bubble in all Ds, you will get a raw score of around 21-23.

If you score less than that, it pretty much means that you failed the test.

BTW, 22 corresponds to a scaled score of 127, and 1% of test takers get 22 or below. To put that another way, there are as many people who do worse on the LSAT than random chance as there are who score 173 or above.

User avatar
Adjudicator
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Adjudicator » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:57 am

dhrizek wrote:If you just bubble in all Ds, you will get a raw score of around 21-23.

If you score less than that, it pretty much means that you failed the test.

BTW, 22 corresponds to a raw score of 127, and 1% of test takers get 22 or below. To put that another way, there are as many people who do worse on the LSAT than random chance as there are who score 173 or above.


Mind = blown.

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby incompetentia » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:00 am

I'd imagine lots of people give up after one section and cancel. Aren't canceled scores calculated in the equation?

User avatar
Blumpbeef
Posts: 3814
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:17 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Blumpbeef » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:05 am

incompetentia wrote:I'd imagine lots of people give up after one section and cancel. Aren't canceled scores calculated in the equation?


I don't think so. I think the assumption is that the scores were canceled for a reason, and as such they are not reported to anybody.

Of course, if somebody walked into the test without having ever practiced and realized what it was about, I doubt they would be concerned enough to actually cancel their scores.

mala2
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:39 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby mala2 » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:48 am

168ish hopefully

User avatar
niederbomb
Posts: 962
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:07 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby niederbomb » Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:12 am

Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about


How do you get a raw score below 0? This isn't the SAT, with a guessing penalty. Even if you get every question incorrect (how is that possible?), the score would be 0, which equals 120, right?

User avatar
Ragged
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Ragged » Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:56 am

kalede wrote:170ish.


I like your avatar alot.

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Bildungsroman » Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:14 am

incompetentia wrote:Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about


How do you get fewer than zero questions correct?

Image

User avatar
doug_7506
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:16 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby doug_7506 » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:08 am

I am pretty sure i made above 160, but If i had to stick a number on it I would say 163

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby incompetentia » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:34 am

Bildungsroman wrote:
incompetentia wrote:Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about


How do you get fewer than zero questions correct?

Image

MAGIC

Hedwig
Posts: 835
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:56 am

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Hedwig » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:45 am

Guys, I had a misunderstanding of the percentile chart, incomp was all "facetious" and I was all "do not understand" and then he explained and I checked and OH WOW THINGS THEN MADE SENSE.

User avatar
Ragged
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Postby Ragged » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:46 am

eit wrote:Guys, I had a misunderstanding of the percentile chart, incomp was all "facetious" and I was all "do not understand" and then he explained and I checked and OH WOW THINGS THEN MADE SENSE.


is that a self tar OMG??!




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 34iplaw, applejacks888, bearedman8, Bing [Bot], BobBoblaw, brewpub16, dontsaywhatyoumean, Instrumental, JoshLyman13, laqueredup, Reeferside, shotgunheist and 43 guests