Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores Forum

kalede · Post by **kalede** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:58 am

170ish.

T6Hopeful · Post by **T6Hopeful** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:02 am

168.
Drunk (maybe if I'm hungover or still drunk I'll won't care as much about a lower score) and praying. Ironic, but whatever works.

catsparka · Post by **catsparka** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:19 am

niederbomb · Post by **niederbomb** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:26 am

166-172

Michigan!

SchopenhauerFTW · Post by **SchopenhauerFTW** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:41 am

JesusChrist · Post by **JesusChrist** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:43 am

haha I like how JesusChrist is on the same row as DamnLSAT.

Hedwig · Post by **Hedwig** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:46 am

Can you actually fail the LSAT? Say you don't get enough right to actually get into percentiles/120? What happens then???

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:47 am

I did read about one kid whose raw score was -4. It ended up being 93 scaled.

Hedwig · Post by **Hedwig** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:52 am

Your facetiousness simply serves to confuse me. I'm not predicting I got a score in the low 20's raw score or anything (or whatever it is) ... just wondering if maybe you had someone who wasn't getting stuff right very much in the first place, and say they misbubbled a couple sections... it could happen. WHAT THEN.

SchopenhauerFTW · Post by **SchopenhauerFTW** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:55 am

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:05 am

eit wrote:Your facetiousness simply serves to confuse me. I'm not predicting I got a score in the low 20's raw score or anything (or whatever it is) ... just wondering if maybe you had someone who wasn't getting stuff right very much in the first place, and say they misbubbled a couple sections... it could happen. WHAT THEN.

Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about

Hedwig · Post by **Hedwig** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:07 am

incompetentia wrote:
eit wrote:Your facetiousness simply serves to confuse me. I'm not predicting I got a score in the low 20's raw score or anything (or whatever it is) ... just wondering if maybe you had someone who wasn't getting stuff right very much in the first place, and say they misbubbled a couple sections... it could happen. WHAT THEN.
Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about

OH makes sense. I was thinking you had to have 15 minimum when I wa slooking at the chart, didn't see it was 0-15.

Well now your facetiousness makes sense.

nsideirish · Post by **nsideirish** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:10 am

What the hell...170 (pleaseeee a -12 curve or better).

Blumpbeef · Post by **Blumpbeef** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:55 am

If you just bubble in all Ds, you will get a raw score of around 21-23.

If you score less than that, it pretty much means that you failed the test.

BTW, 22 corresponds to a scaled score of 127, and 1% of test takers get 22 or below. To put that another way, there are as many people who do worse on the LSAT than random chance as there are who score 173 or above.

Adjudicator · Post by **Adjudicator** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:57 am

dhrizek wrote:If you just bubble in all Ds, you will get a raw score of around 21-23.

If you score less than that, it pretty much means that you failed the test.

BTW, 22 corresponds to a raw score of 127, and 1% of test takers get 22 or below. To put that another way, there are as many people who do worse on the LSAT than random chance as there are who score 173 or above.

Mind = blown.

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:00 am

I'd imagine lots of people give up after one section and cancel. Aren't canceled scores calculated in the equation?

Blumpbeef · Post by **Blumpbeef** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:05 am

incompetentia wrote:I'd imagine lots of people give up after one section and cancel. Aren't canceled scores calculated in the equation?

I don't think so. I think the assumption is that the scores were canceled for a reason, and as such they are not reported to anybody.

Of course, if somebody walked into the test without having ever practiced and realized what it was about, I doubt they would be concerned enough to actually cancel their scores.

mala2 · Post by **mala2** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:48 am

168ish hopefully

niederbomb · Post by **niederbomb** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:12 am

Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about

How do you get a raw score below 0? This isn't the SAT, with a guessing penalty. Even if you get every question incorrect (how is that possible?), the score would be 0, which equals 120, right?

Ragged · Post by **Ragged** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:56 am

kalede wrote:170ish.

I like your avatar alot.

Bildungsroman · Post by **Bildungsroman** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:14 am

incompetentia wrote:Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about

How do you get fewer than zero questions correct?

doug_7506 · Post by **doug_7506** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:08 am

I am pretty sure i made above 160, but If i had to stick a number on it I would say 163

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:34 am

Bildungsroman wrote:
incompetentia wrote:Minimum correct listed for 120 is always 0. To get lower, you'd have to either misspell your name or get a -4 raw like that guy I heard about
How do you get fewer than zero questions correct?

MAGIC

Hedwig · Post by **Hedwig** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:45 am

Guys, I had a misunderstanding of the percentile chart, incomp was all "facetious" and I was all "do not understand" and then he explained and I checked and OH WOW THINGS THEN MADE SENSE.

Ragged · Post by **Ragged** » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:46 am

eit wrote:Guys, I had a misunderstanding of the percentile chart, incomp was all "facetious" and I was all "do not understand" and then he explained and I checked and OH WOW THINGS THEN MADE SENSE.

is that a self tar OMG??!

Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores Forum

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Register for access!

Re: .

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Register now!

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Re: Official List of TLS'ers Predicted Oct. Scores

Seriously? What are you waiting for?