LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally Forum
- skirschner1
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:27 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
first post. yay
- lennonist
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:38 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
New members (for Shooter to update):
s0ph1e2007
AverageTutoring
cynthia rose
nihil1315
Fresh
WonkyPanda
alphagamma
BackToTheOldHouse
Godlike
ballents
birdlaw117
moxiepostulate
eit
Lokomani
legal_eagle
jwaters
arvcondor
skirschner1
s0ph1e2007
AverageTutoring
cynthia rose
nihil1315
Fresh
WonkyPanda
alphagamma
BackToTheOldHouse
Godlike
ballents
birdlaw117
moxiepostulate
eit
Lokomani
legal_eagle
jwaters
arvcondor
skirschner1
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
Yay.
DISCLAIMER: This post on this website (where post refers to each individual, consentual and certifiably authentic addition to topic, which in turn refers to a collection of these additions under a common title, designated by the creator of the topic), will not be construed as binding in the event of an "epic fail" (where this internet meme refers to the situation where the failure is so pervasive, utter and final that the failing party no longer has the willpower to live) so long as this post is not linked to the actual LSAT taker that frequently uses this alias (where alias refers to the needless cry for anonymity, or its material reflection thereof) beyond a shadow of doubt. This condition will not be met by simply proving the post was made from the user's computer, unless there is no reasonable doubt that the usual user of the alias made this posting.
DISCLAIMER: This post on this website (where post refers to each individual, consentual and certifiably authentic addition to topic, which in turn refers to a collection of these additions under a common title, designated by the creator of the topic), will not be construed as binding in the event of an "epic fail" (where this internet meme refers to the situation where the failure is so pervasive, utter and final that the failing party no longer has the willpower to live) so long as this post is not linked to the actual LSAT taker that frequently uses this alias (where alias refers to the needless cry for anonymity, or its material reflection thereof) beyond a shadow of doubt. This condition will not be met by simply proving the post was made from the user's computer, unless there is no reasonable doubt that the usual user of the alias made this posting.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:30 am
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
I'll join in. Yay.
This is my third time, so I'm hoping for 170+
Previous tests included:
June '09: 166 (I nailed the games (for me) that everyone dreaded (ahem dino game); then out of overconfidence bombed the LR sections).
Sept '09: 168 (This time I nailed the LR sections (-2 across both - good for me) then got owned by the games (2 In-Out style games that I screwed up).)
Here's hoping I got both right and didn't screw up the RC.
This is my third time, so I'm hoping for 170+
Previous tests included:
June '09: 166 (I nailed the games (for me) that everyone dreaded (ahem dino game); then out of overconfidence bombed the LR sections).
Sept '09: 168 (This time I nailed the LR sections (-2 across both - good for me) then got owned by the games (2 In-Out style games that I screwed up).)
Here's hoping I got both right and didn't screw up the RC.
- lennonist
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:38 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
I regret to inform you, but your Disclaimer was denied. You will be, as a result, added as a 'yay' and will, thereby be obligated to post your "dismal" score. Simply put: dude, i remember your average PTs - you will do exceptionally well (and definitely better than me!) so quit being a lil' biyatch and be excited about your undoubtedly awesome scorenullisecundus wrote:Yay.
DISCLAIMER: This post on this website (where post refers to each individual, consentual and certifiably authentic addition to topic, which in turn refers to a collection of these additions under a common title, designated by the creator of the topic), will not be construed as binding in the event of an "epic fail" (where this internet meme refers to the situation where the failure is so pervasive, utter and final that the failing party no longer has the willpower to live) so long as this post is not linked to the actual LSAT taker that frequently uses this alias (where alias refers to the needless cry for anonymity, or its material reflection thereof) beyond a shadow of doubt. This condition will not be met by simply proving the post was made from the user's computer, unless there is no reasonable doubt that the usual user of the alias made this posting.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- eliekedourie
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:27 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
Yay. Meh...
- chaosnoodlesoup
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 1:07 am
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
Affirmative.
- Eugenie Danglars
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:04 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
Wouldn't it have to be two of them?Sandro777 wrote:in grade school they showed us a play about a group of girls who made a blood pact... then one of them got aids.
- sgtgrumbles
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:46 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Blumpbeef
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:17 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
Oui?
Hope: 171
Prediction: disappointment, reevaluation of my self worth
Hope: 171
Prediction: disappointment, reevaluation of my self worth
- omninode
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
Yay.
I will attempt to post before my heart explodes from grief/joy/indifference (it could happen).
I will attempt to post before my heart explodes from grief/joy/indifference (it could happen).
- kkklick
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:33 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
At least this time there will be tons of scores instead of june where only 20 people posted there 170s
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Shooter
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
"Pact makes it possible."kkklick wrote:At least this time there will be tons of scores instead of june where only 20 people posted there 170s
- catsparka
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
Not to be all special-snowflake here, but are we the first test group on TLS to actually have a thread dedicated to a score release blood pact?
- Blumpbeef
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:17 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
There will only aout 700 or so people in the whole world that score in the 170s, right?
Its pretty crazy when you think about it.
Its pretty crazy when you think about it.
- Blindc1rca
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 6:11 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
i believe it is spelled "yea"
entonces:
i love nilla YEAfers
so yea
and honestly YAY!! too
entonces:
i love nilla YEAfers
so yea
and honestly YAY!! too
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kkklick
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:33 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
I can't say for sure, but as seen from the lack of posted scores the past few LSAT's I doubt it. Just shows how crazy this wait has driven us!catsparka wrote:Not to be all special-snowflake here, but are we the first test group on TLS to actually have a thread dedicated to a score release blood pact?
- Shooter
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
You know what? You might be right. But if I change it now, there would be like 50 "yays" that I would have to nullify.Blindc1rca wrote:i believe it is spelled "yea"
entonces:
i love nilla YEAfers
so yea
and honestly YAY!! too
I just can't do it. But you have been added to the pact.
- incompetentia
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
1.8% roughly...out of say 60,000 takers that's 1080 people. Close enough thoughdhrizek wrote:There will only aout 700 or so people in the whole world that score in the 170s, right?
Its pretty crazy when you think about it.
Roughly 200 175+ and twelve 180s.
I bet TLS makes up at least 5% of each category
- Shooter
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:39 am
Re: LSAT Blood Pact - Official Tally
I'd say this is the first pact of its kind.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login