PT 61?

User avatar
dsb83
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm

PT 61?

Postby dsb83 » Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:10 pm

When will PT 61 be released?

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: PT 61?

Postby incompetentia » Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:18 pm

Relax, the 61 takers haven't even gotten their scores yet.

User avatar
LSAT Blog
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: PT 61?

Postby LSAT Blog » Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:37 pm

People who took the Oct LSAT will receive access to PDFs of it in their LSAC accounts when scores come out (likely Friday, 10/29).

People who didn't take the Oct LSAT should be able to get it (PT61) a few weeks before the December exam.

2011Law
Posts: 822
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm

Re: PT 61?

Postby 2011Law » Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:08 pm

LSAT Blog wrote:People who didn't take the Oct LSAT should be able to get it (PT61) a few weeks before the December exam.


Didn't know about this. I feel like I already have enough PTs to be prepared for December, but then I also hear that 61 was somewhat different from the most recent ones. Does anyone else think this is true?

User avatar
2014
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: PT 61?

Postby 2014 » Sat Oct 23, 2010 1:15 pm

2011Law wrote:
LSAT Blog wrote:People who didn't take the Oct LSAT should be able to get it (PT61) a few weeks before the December exam.


Didn't know about this. I feel like I already have enough PTs to be prepared for December, but then I also hear that 61 was somewhat different from the most recent ones. Does anyone else think this is true?

A few questions were weird but all in all it was not noticeably different than the rest of the recent PTs.

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: PT 61?

Postby incompetentia » Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:02 pm

It was no weirder than 59 or 60 in my opinion. The test was fairly normal, with just some weird moments.

mtrl
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:13 pm

Re: PT 61?

Postby mtrl » Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:06 pm

There's no sense in not buying the test if you can buy it. Might as well have as many recent tests as possible.

clone22
Posts: 354
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:38 pm

Re: PT 61?

Postby clone22 » Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:11 am

mtrl wrote:There's no sense in not buying the test if you can buy it. Might as well have as many recent tests as possible.

unless one gets it for free.

side question: is it against forum rules to suggest torrenting test prep material?

Hedwig
Posts: 835
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 1:56 am

Re: PT 61?

Postby Hedwig » Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:16 am

I am of the opinion that any LSAT you take in LSAT conditions is likely to feel weird. If you took a prep test and did nothing but re-think the questions on the prep test and have cloak and dagger debates about them on a forum for a week or so, you would probably end up thinking that prep test was pretty damn weird, too.

That said, I found it weird. But yeah, chill, nobody even knows what they got on 61 or what the curve was. You're not gonna get it before we do.

It'll be out in enough time for you to use it for December, rest assured.

User avatar
dcman06
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:08 pm

Re: PT 61?

Postby dcman06 » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:54 am

clone22 wrote:
mtrl wrote:There's no sense in not buying the test if you can buy it. Might as well have as many recent tests as possible.

unless one gets it for free.

side question: is it against forum rules to suggest torrenting test prep material?


It's against LSAC rules to distribute question material before they're released, but once we get the disclosure book, I think we're free to say whatever we want. Dunno about the book itself though.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BobBoblaw, freekick and 1 guest