There was an inference question in the Art Forgeries passage that drove me crazy, and no one has given me a satisfactory defense of any answer choice. None of them seemed supported to me.
Unfortunately, becasue the question just asked which claim was "most supported" by the passage, I can't give any more detail without listing answer choices. At the risk of being banned, one had to do with the criteria by which we decide a painting is a fraud, and one effectively said that originality of vision was necessary to successful forgeries. Mods, please remove if I've said too much.
Oh, also it was on the top right-hand corner of the page.
If anyone knows what I'm talking about, and has any idea what the right answer was, please PM me! I'm dying to know.
Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
2 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests