Overheard at the LSAT

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:30 pm

Tom Joad wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:Marlo's gone full douchetard.

Good can still come of this. The mods could ban all NYC IPs.

i fucking hope so.

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23647
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby chup » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:31 pm

marlo3point0 wrote:Seriously? In the age of IP proxy, an IP ban? lol. I'll be reading the boards. Don't get a heart attack. You can't do anything about it :wink: .

OK, how about this: You stop registering proxies and accept your ban, and I don't forward your most common IP addresses to the LSAC security account and post them here for all to see.

User avatar
Br3v
Posts: 4174
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby Br3v » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:32 pm

Called it

User avatar
flem
Posts: 12949
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby flem » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:33 pm

chup wrote:OK, how about this: You stop registering proxies and accept your ban, and I don't forward your most common IP addresses to the LSAC security account and post them here for all to see.


popcorn.gif

User avatar
birdlaw117
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:19 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby birdlaw117 » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:34 pm

Can someone please create Marlo4point0 from a proxy right now?

Edit: don't actually do this, btw.
Last edited by birdlaw117 on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bjsesq
TLS Poet Laureate
Posts: 13383
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby bjsesq » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:36 pm

chup wrote:
marlo3point0 wrote:Seriously? In the age of IP proxy, an IP ban? lol. I'll be reading the boards. Don't get a heart attack. You can't do anything about it :wink: .

OK, how about this: You stop registering proxies and accept your ban, and I don't forward your most common IP addresses to the LSAC security account and post them here for all to see.


Well, this just got real pretty quickly.

User avatar
flem
Posts: 12949
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby flem » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:36 pm

bjsesq wrote:Well, this just got real pretty quickly.


bro, remember, marlo gives zero fucks

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby 3|ink » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:37 pm

Work is suddenly tolerable.

Mal Reynolds
Posts: 12630
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby Mal Reynolds » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:37 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:
Tom Joad wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:Where did this happen?

I know mods are on the case, because I made a "LOLO MARLO SUCKS" post in the moderation thread and it got deleted. If he didn't obviously suck so bad I would probably be looking at losing banginity.


EDIT: shitty quoting
huh? chup told him to enjoy his vacation, and I assume it is at least in part, a body of work ban


I was confused about what ban you were talking about. He was already banned so I thought you were talking as if chup had already permabanned him.

User avatar
bjsesq
TLS Poet Laureate
Posts: 13383
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby bjsesq » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:38 pm

flem wrote:
bjsesq wrote:Well, this just got real pretty quickly.


bro, remember, marlo gives zero fucks


Irregularity reports aren't something to fuck around with. He needs to back off.

User avatar
Paraflam
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby Paraflam » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:39 pm

I mean, even if LSAC were to find out exactly who this guy is, they wouldn't really have any way of telling if he actually cheated or not.

User avatar
specialsnowflake
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:48 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby specialsnowflake » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:40 pm

want more lulz pwease

User avatar
twenty
Posts: 3153
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby twenty » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:40 pm

This is the best day ever.

edit> lololol180posts

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23647
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby chup » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:41 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:huh? chup told him to enjoy his vacation, and I assume it is at least in part, a body of work ban

I banned him for two weeks for either a) trolling in the on-topics, or b) cheating on the LSAT and posting about it seemingly to gloat (which is basically still trolling in the on-topics). His shit-posting elsewhere on TLS wasn't really a factor, and it wasn't a body-of-work ban. When I banned the first alt I IP banned for a month because I'm lazy (phpBB gives you 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, etc. options, and you have to manually enter the dates/times for anything else).

bruss
Posts: 470
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 3:58 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby bruss » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:42 pm

chup wrote:
marlo45 wrote:No more hateful responses?

Alright, i'm fucking with you. I didn't/couldn't go back to any section even if i wanted to because i was sitting right in front of one of the proctors (his desk was 3 feet from mine). I didn't/couldn't bring a digital timer because they check your shit. I didn't/couldn't bring blank/plain paper for the aforementioned reason.

Why can't we bring blank paper to the test site for diagramming? A simple (no alarm) digital timer? And why the fuck can't the test be given as a whole where you can benefit from your strengths to offset your weaknesses?

LSAC, fuck you. I might be sitting the Oct. test, though, so don't hold that against me.

Enjoy your vacation, dick.


chup. Since when do we use lounge language in the prep area. Wow

katesearches
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:27 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby katesearches » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:42 pm

RedBirds2011 wrote:
katesearches wrote:I was pretty much in a daze most of the time, but there was this one girl who was talking really loudly during the break.

"That was SO easy. I know I did really well on it. I mean, it can't be anything but easy for me, I don't know about you guys."

I was so tempted to turn around, glare at her and tell her to shut up. Maybe I was more sensitive than usual, but it just rubbed me the wrong way, kinda obnoxious.



"I mean it can't be anything but easy for me"

Lolwut. I fucking hate people lol


i know seriously

User avatar
bjsesq
TLS Poet Laureate
Posts: 13383
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby bjsesq » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:43 pm

Paraflam wrote:I mean, even if LSAC were to find out exactly who this guy is, they wouldn't really have any way of telling if he actually cheated or not.


Think that will stop them from noting an irregularity?

User avatar
flem
Posts: 12949
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby flem » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:43 pm

bjsesq wrote:
Paraflam wrote:I mean, even if LSAC were to find out exactly who this guy is, they wouldn't really have any way of telling if he actually cheated or not.


Think that will stop them from noting an irregularity?


Especially if he retook and jumped from a previous score

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby JamMasterJ » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:43 pm

chup wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:huh? chup told him to enjoy his vacation, and I assume it is at least in part, a body of work ban

I banned him for two weeks for either a) trolling in the on-topics, or b) cheating on the LSAT and posting about it seemingly to gloat (which is basically still trolling in the on-topics). His shit-posting elsewhere on TLS wasn't really a factor, and it wasn't a body-of-work ban. When I banned the first alt I IP banned for a month because I'm lazy (phpBB gives you 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, etc. options, and you have to manually enter the dates/times for anything else).

are people's obnoxious behavior in the off topics ever a factor (disregarding hate speak, AA debate etc.)?

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23647
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby chup » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:44 pm

bruss wrote:
chup wrote:
marlo45 wrote:No more hateful responses?

Alright, i'm fucking with you. I didn't/couldn't go back to any section even if i wanted to because i was sitting right in front of one of the proctors (his desk was 3 feet from mine). I didn't/couldn't bring a digital timer because they check your shit. I didn't/couldn't bring blank/plain paper for the aforementioned reason.

Why can't we bring blank paper to the test site for diagramming? A simple (no alarm) digital timer? And why the fuck can't the test be given as a whole where you can benefit from your strengths to offset your weaknesses?

LSAC, fuck you. I might be sitting the Oct. test, though, so don't hold that against me.

Enjoy your vacation, dick.


chup. Since when do we use lounge language in the prep area. Wow

This is the second time my liberality with language has given you the vapors. Do you need to sit down for a minute?

User avatar
chup
Posts: 23647
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby chup » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:46 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:
chup wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:huh? chup told him to enjoy his vacation, and I assume it is at least in part, a body of work ban

I banned him for two weeks for either a) trolling in the on-topics, or b) cheating on the LSAT and posting about it seemingly to gloat (which is basically still trolling in the on-topics). His shit-posting elsewhere on TLS wasn't really a factor, and it wasn't a body-of-work ban. When I banned the first alt I IP banned for a month because I'm lazy (phpBB gives you 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, etc. options, and you have to manually enter the dates/times for anything else).

are people's obnoxious behavior in the off topics ever a factor (disregarding hate speak, AA debate etc.)?

It didn't do him any favors here, but the universal rule is that you have to do something banworthy per se to get banned. There are plenty of terrible posters who manage to stay well within the rules. The body-of-work ban is very rare.

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby 3|ink » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:47 pm

specialsnowflake wrote:want more lulz pwease


Image

bruss wrote:
chup wrote:Enjoy your vacation, dick.


chup. Since when do we use lounge language in the prep area. Wow

Mal Reynolds
Posts: 12630
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby Mal Reynolds » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:49 pm

Bruss is in here now? This thread is like moths to the flame, but for idiots.

User avatar
Mr. Pancakes
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby Mr. Pancakes » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:53 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:Bruss is in here now? This thread is like moths to the flame, but for idiots.

hai
Image

User avatar
flem
Posts: 12949
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:44 pm

Re: Overheard at the LSAT

Postby flem » Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:53 pm

Mr. Pancakes wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:Bruss is in here now? This thread is like moths to the flame, but for idiots.

hai
Image


This is the best gif you have ever posted




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 34iplaw, blackpi, BobBoblaw, jagerbom79, jonny27, Yahoo [Bot] and 8 guests