WonkyPanda wrote:Sinra wrote:I'm figuring a -10. I honestly didn't think it was too hard. RC was very easy IMO. LG were ok and LR is LR. I felt more like PT 58 than 59 or 60. No way it's a -14 monster like Dec 09. That test deserved a generous curve.
Agreed, this test was easier than 59 and 60. I am guessing a -11, but we'll see what kind of cooky algorithm/method LSAC does to finally make that curve.
I'm thinking I scored a -11, and thats what I'm hoping for. RC wasn't too ridiculous, LGs were easy, although I thought the LRs were above average difficulty. Not as bad 59LR1 maybe, but harder than most other sections I've done.