lsat makers should remove LGs

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby d34d9823 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:38 am

kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?

And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.

Oh snap, kazu you always win.

User avatar
kazu
Posts: 1602
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby kazu » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:41 am

d34dluk3 wrote:
kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?

And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.

Oh snap, kazu you always win.

:lol: :lol: We miss you at SF, come baaack!!!! The deadly trinity just isn't the same without you.

User avatar
Jack Smirks
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby Jack Smirks » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:42 am

kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?

And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.

This is what happens when you wander outside of our thread too much, you become jaded by the outside TLS world. Come back.

User avatar
AVBucks4239
Posts: 870
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:37 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby AVBucks4239 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:31 am

naterj wrote::oops: I'm sorry you're right. I feel like such an idiot and such a jerk. We should just be able to have a giant melting pot of forums. I

mean why can't all the forums be discussed together in one mega Utopian forum where we all live in harmony? In a free world without

discrimination we would be able to discuss LSAT in the URM forum and take the lounge into the "what are my chances?" forum.

Why not discuss Illinois in the Iowa thread and GULC in the WUSTL thread and so on and so on...

It's exactly the sort of narrow minded thinking that I'm taking part in that led to the Klan, Hitler and so much more...

I've PMed you a heartfelt apology. I hope you will accept.

This is the best use of sarcasm in the history of TLS (seriously, no sarcasm).

User avatar
acrossthelake
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby acrossthelake » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:40 pm

kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:
kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?

And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.

Oh snap, kazu you always win.

:lol: :lol: We miss you at SF, come baaack!!!! The deadly trinity just isn't the same without you.


+1

What are Xena & Lara Croft to do without their Master Chief???

nStiver
Posts: 388
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:15 am

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby nStiver » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:44 pm

incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest


Work on your english there Chang...
Last edited by nStiver on Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
acrossthelake
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby acrossthelake » Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:54 pm

naterj wrote:
kazu wrote:
d34dluk3 wrote:What's with the influx of morons lately? Do they come here for three weeks after the LSAT before they get their hopes crushed?

And then they stay to crush the dreams of others.

This is what happens when you wander outside of our thread too much, you become jaded by the outside TLS world. Come back.


Our thread is the only way to stay happy. We administer lolcat therapy. It's good for you.

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby incompetentia » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:03 pm

nStiver wrote:
incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest


Work on your english there Chang...

That was the point. This thread is completely unsalvageable so might as well have some fun while we go down with the ship

nStiver
Posts: 388
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:15 am

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby nStiver » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:09 pm

incompetentia wrote:
nStiver wrote:
incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest


Work on your english there Chang...

That was the point. This thread is completely unsalvageable so might as well have some fun while we go down with the ship


I know I thought it was funny.

User avatar
Jack Smirks
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 5:35 am

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby Jack Smirks » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:09 pm

incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest


Image

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby incompetentia » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:10 pm

naterj wrote:
incompetentia wrote:Hey guys, I really like LG. Their electronic are good and they are very interest


Image

I am fan love of this miniatures computer !!

User avatar
bk1
Posts: 18418
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby bk1 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:13 pm

The LSAT should be 4 sections:

1. Sudoku
2. Arm Wrestling
3. Paintball
4. Drinking Contest

Actually now that I think about it, it should start with the drinking contest.

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: lsat makers should remove LGs

Postby d34d9823 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:16 pm

bk1 wrote:The LSAT should be 4 sections:

1. Sudoku
2. Arm Wrestling
3. Paintball
4. Drinking Contest

Actually now that I think about it, it should start with the drinking contest.

You're not that far off. It typically ends with the drinking contest.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], cianchetta0, dontsaywhatyoumean, DumbHollywoodActor and 10 guests