Die LG

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:42 pm

LogicGamez wrote:
Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...


Pretty sure a 3.7 won't hold you back to Cornell.

Stanford maybe, but not Cornell


I have no realistic shot at any t14 other than Cornell with my PT score ranges of 167-170.

I also want to stay in NY or Boston. Only other NY school I think I have a chance at which might be worth going to is Fordham - but I'm not willing to pay sticker for it.

and 3.7 is their new median. Their 75th is like above 3.8 now.

LogicGamez
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:19 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby LogicGamez » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:44 pm

tazmolover wrote:
LogicGamez wrote:
Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...


Pretty sure a 3.7 won't hold you back to Cornell.

Stanford maybe, but not Cornell


I have no realistic shot at any t14 other than Cornell with my PT score ranges of 167-170.

I also want to stay in NY or Boston. Only other NY school I think I have a chance at which might be worth going to is Fordham - but I'm not willing to pay sticker for it.

and 3.7 is their new median. Their 75th is like above 3.8 now.

http://cornell.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/

You need like a 168/3.5/non-urm to have a good shot at Cornell

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:46 pm

LogicGamez wrote:
tazmolover wrote:
LogicGamez wrote:
Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...


Pretty sure a 3.7 won't hold you back to Cornell.

Stanford maybe, but not Cornell


I have no realistic shot at any t14 other than Cornell with my PT score ranges of 167-170.

I also want to stay in NY or Boston. Only other NY school I think I have a chance at which might be worth going to is Fordham - but I'm not willing to pay sticker for it.

and 3.7 is their new median. Their 75th is like above 3.8 now.

http://cornell.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/

You need like a 168/3.5/non-urm to have a good shot at Cornell


Well, I won't hit a 168 on this test unless God guided my pencil and led to guess correctly on 3 questions lol.

Also @ Lawfoolz - my pm limit has been reached. Sorry!

JacobH
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby JacobH » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:48 pm

tazmolover wrote:Well, I won't hit a 168 on this test unless God guided my pencil and led to guess correctly on 3 questions lol.

Also @ Lawfoolz - my pm limit has been reached. Sorry!


Haha, couldn't God have guided to to get everything else correct? 98/101, barring those 3 you guessed wrongly on.

=P

Lets be more optimistic now.

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:50 pm

JacobH wrote:
tazmolover wrote:Well, I won't hit a 168 on this test unless God guided my pencil and led to guess correctly on 3 questions lol.

Also @ Lawfoolz - my pm limit has been reached. Sorry!


Haha, couldn't God have guided to to get everything else correct? 98/101, barring those 3 you guessed wrongly on.

=P

Lets be more optimistic now.

This is pretty much the only reason I'm not canceling 8)

That and I'm too curious about how low I can score when I bomb an entire section lol.

JacobH
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby JacobH » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:58 pm

tazmolover wrote:
JacobH wrote:
tazmolover wrote:Well, I won't hit a 168 on this test unless God guided my pencil and led to guess correctly on 3 questions lol.

Also @ Lawfoolz - my pm limit has been reached. Sorry!


Haha, couldn't God have guided to to get everything else correct? 98/101, barring those 3 you guessed wrongly on.

=P

Lets be more optimistic now.

This is pretty much the only reason I'm not canceling 8)

That and I'm too curious about how low I can score when I bomb an entire section lol.


Nothing better than the real thing to gauge yourself right?

=D

User avatar
aesis
Posts: 323
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby aesis » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:22 am

I had the most excruciating shitting balls experimental LG for section 2. RE: Subzones. And Game 1 a three-tiered multivariable grouping game.

Thus, when I got to the real LG, I was like "Please Lord let this be real." And it was!

In the end, I didn't think this was too tough. I ended up rushing through Nurses, but for the most part finished. There's no reason to think I seriously fcked up apart from: 1) misbubble? didn't check; 2) didn't have time to check my answers. I'd say this was moderate. Substitution questions are tricky though.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, dianersg, DumbHollywoodActor, Google [Bot], Greenteachurro, Instrumental, Jatt, judill, mrgstephe, Tsubomi93, Yahoo [Bot] and 14 guests