Die LG

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby 3|ink » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:15 pm

KevinP wrote:Fuck this LG.

I had LR LG RC LR LG.

I completely aced the first 4 sections but when the real LG (5th section) came, I completely froze up on the first game. And it was only one question that fucked me over. I should of just fucking skipped the one LG question that took me like 15 minutes. I'm always 0-1 on games. DAMN IT.


Yeah. You definitely should have skipped. This happened to me twice today (skipped a question and went back to it after finishing section) and both times I figured it out after returning.

EK14
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:04 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby EK14 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:18 pm

I usually consider LG to be one of my weaker sections, but i crushed the section 5 LG. I finished the first 3 games in 20 minutes. Finished 4th with 5 min to go, and review almost all my answers.. i thought the LR LG RC LR LG , is the most generous format, so lucky that i got it.

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby incompetentia » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:21 pm

I went into every section giving myself 150 seconds on each question. If I exceeded that limit, I skipped it and came back to it at the end.

Worked like a charm. Both LR sections I finished with less than two minutes to spare.

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:23 pm

incompetentia wrote:I went into every section giving myself 150 seconds on each question. If I exceeded that limit, I skipped it and came back to it at the end.

Worked like a charm. Both LR sections I finished with less than two minutes to spare.


I should have done this.

For one LR section I thought I was good on time on the 12th question when I looked at the clock and boom...20 minutes had passed.

I freaked and I'm pretty sure I missed everything.

User avatar
Adjudicator
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am

Re: Die LG

Postby Adjudicator » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:25 pm

Ha, I skipped the infamous brick house question, then ended up coming back to it at the end with like 7 minutes remaining and spending the whole 7 minutes working on it. And I still wasn't very confident in my answer.

tenpenny3
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:33 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tenpenny3 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:30 pm

I shat my pants when I saw the copious amounts of free space for the 1st section of LG, i think it was game 3? When i realized it was a exp section I ended up being ok lol. overall, I didn't think the games were that bad, but not easy by any means.

ohlawl
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:39 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby ohlawl » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:31 pm

I actually felt really good about the LG section. I finished with 6 minutes remaining and went back over all my unsure answers. Now RC... I think I bombed that. :(

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby incompetentia » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:32 pm

Adjudicator wrote:Ha, I skipped the infamous brick house question, then ended up coming back to it at the end with like 7 minutes remaining and spending the whole 7 minutes working on it. And I still wasn't very confident in my answer.

Was it just me that thought this question was not difficult?

That of course means I probably got it wrong...

EK14
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:04 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby EK14 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:38 pm

I usually consider LG to be one of my weaker sections, but i crushed the section 5 LG. I finished the first 3 games in 20 minutes. Finished 4th with 5 min to go, and review almost all my answers.. i thought the LR LG RC LR LG , is the most generous format, so lucky that i got it.

User avatar
Aro5389
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:35 am

Re: Die LG

Postby Aro5389 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:42 pm

I had the same format, and yes, the 1st game was horsecrap. I knew I shoulda skipped it ASAP and by Q3 I finally did... wish they'd wait until at least Game 2 to give the hardest game.

JacobH
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby JacobH » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:10 pm

incompetentia wrote:
Adjudicator wrote:Ha, I skipped the infamous brick house question, then ended up coming back to it at the end with like 7 minutes remaining and spending the whole 7 minutes working on it. And I still wasn't very confident in my answer.

Was it just me that thought this question was not difficult?

That of course means I probably got it wrong...


Nah, I didn't find it too difficult either. I think it's just the way people's brain work. Something that's obvious to everyone else can be torture to one person.

eve2490
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:00 am

.

Postby eve2490 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:15 pm

.
Last edited by eve2490 on Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:46 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby 3|ink » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:24 pm

eve2490 wrote:I was very glad to see a pure sequencing game in section 5.


I wasn't. The moment I saw that, I realized -11 curve, MAX

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:24 pm

3|ink wrote:
eve2490 wrote:I was very glad to see a pure sequencing game in section 5.


I wasn't. The moment I saw that, I realized -11 curve, MAX

Wasn't there a pure sequencing game on PT60....with a -14 curve?

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby 3|ink » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:25 pm

tazmolover wrote:
3|ink wrote:
eve2490 wrote:I was very glad to see a pure sequencing game in section 5.


I wasn't. The moment I saw that, I realized -11 curve, MAX

Wasn't there a pure sequencing game on PT60....with a -14 curve?


It wasn't pure sequencing. It was a conditional sequencing.

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:26 pm

3|ink wrote:
tazmolover wrote:
3|ink wrote:
eve2490 wrote:I was very glad to see a pure sequencing game in section 5.


I wasn't. The moment I saw that, I realized -11 curve, MAX

Wasn't there a pure sequencing game on PT60....with a -14 curve?


It wasn't pure sequencing. It was a conditional sequencing.

WELL FUCK MY DREAMS ARE GOING UP IN FLAMES

LogicGamez
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:19 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby LogicGamez » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:28 pm

1st game required combination diagramming, like the dino game in June 09, but much easier. Once you got the diagram the questions were super obvious.

User avatar
oreo3405
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:25 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby oreo3405 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:29 pm

ohlawl wrote:I actually felt really good about the LG section. I finished with 6 minutes remaining and went back over all my unsure answers. Now RC... I think I bombed that. :(


I second that exact sentence, had a ton of time to review and solidify my LG answers, the 4th passage in RC killed me.

policestate1234
Posts: 97
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:43 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby policestate1234 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:30 pm

Adjudicator wrote:
dingoesatmybaby wrote:ive come to the realization that the first game (the drivers) was the hardest. I spent about 13 minutes on it but Im fairly certain I got them all right. It was just so time consuming! AND FOR ONLY 5 QUESTIONS!! Although, I semi made up for it, by literally breezing through Game 2 in about 5 minutes. I dont know why I found it so easy, my setup made for some very helpful inferences and something about it just clicked. Game 3 took me about 9 or 10 minutes but once again Im fairly certain I got them all right. Then Section 4 was difficult, but I now Im thinking it was probably due to the fact that I ran out of time and didnt get to complete it.


Yeah, I think the drivers game was the hardest for me, and game 2 was the easiest... I don't even remember what it was because I did it so fast.


Same..the 1st game took me 10 mins but I was able to build time on the second one in 5 mins.

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:33 pm

policestate1234 wrote:
Adjudicator wrote:
dingoesatmybaby wrote:ive come to the realization that the first game (the drivers) was the hardest. I spent about 13 minutes on it but Im fairly certain I got them all right. It was just so time consuming! AND FOR ONLY 5 QUESTIONS!! Although, I semi made up for it, by literally breezing through Game 2 in about 5 minutes. I dont know why I found it so easy, my setup made for some very helpful inferences and something about it just clicked. Game 3 took me about 9 or 10 minutes but once again Im fairly certain I got them all right. Then Section 4 was difficult, but I now Im thinking it was probably due to the fact that I ran out of time and didnt get to complete it.


Yeah, I think the drivers game was the hardest for me, and game 2 was the easiest... I don't even remember what it was because I did it so fast.


Same..the 1st game took me 10 mins but I was able to build time on the second one in 5 mins.


I spent 9-10min on first game, so I kinda rushed through 2nd one, but I was pretty confident in my 3rd game, then had around 13 minutes left for game 4...which I needed every second of.

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby 3|ink » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:35 pm

tazmolover wrote:WELL FUCK MY DREAMS ARE GOING UP IN FLAMES


How many times have you taken the LSAT?

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:37 pm

3|ink wrote:
tazmolover wrote:WELL FUCK MY DREAMS ARE GOING UP IN FLAMES


How many times have you taken the LSAT?


First time.

I think I would have been confident on this test...if it wasn't for 1 LR section...(which I BOMBED) Blind guessed 3+.

Anyways I'm a senior with a useless double major polsci/history and probably will fulfill my philosophy major requirement also.

Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...

So this test has got me feeling pretty down. Unless I score in my high PT range on december test and get into Cornell, I don't see myself going into law school next year...thus me working at 7/11.

lawfoolz
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:32 am

Re: Die LG

Postby lawfoolz » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:38 pm

what were the lg question types ie runners strict sequencing artifact? Drivers, nurses?
.

LogicGamez
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:19 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby LogicGamez » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:40 pm

Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...


Pretty sure a 3.7 won't hold you back to Cornell.

Stanford maybe, but not Cornell

JacobH
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: Die LG

Postby JacobH » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:41 pm

tazmolover wrote:
3|ink wrote:
tazmolover wrote:WELL FUCK MY DREAMS ARE GOING UP IN FLAMES


How many times have you taken the LSAT?


First time.

I think I would have been confident on this test...if it wasn't for 1 LR section...(which I BOMBED) Blind guessed 3+.

Anyways I'm a senior with a useless double major polsci/history and probably will fulfill my philosophy major requirement also.

Triple major but no job prospects. I was thinking of taking a year off since December LSAT will be late in the cycle and I probably won't get into my dream school of Cornell with my 3.7x (maybe 3.8x) lsac gpa...

So this test has got me feeling pretty down. Unless I score in my high PT range on december test and get into Cornell, I don't see myself going into law school next year...thus me working at 7/11.


3.7x and not getting into Cornell WHAT!?

3.7x is way above their 75% isn't it? IIRC, their LSAT range is relatively low too.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 34iplaw, dontsaywhatyoumean, jen203, PRinNYC, rinkrat19, ucantcme and 19 guests