Your Optimal Section Sequence?

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:25 pm

Hypothetically if you could choose the order of your test and didn't know which one was experimental and all sections were of equal difficulty...

What would you have chosen?

I would have chosen RC-LR-LR-RC-LG

Ishotthedeputy
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:03 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby Ishotthedeputy » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:27 pm

LG - LR - LR- LR - RC

cowgirl_bebop
Posts: 901
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:32 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby cowgirl_bebop » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:27 pm

LR LG LR RC LR

Really, anything that does NOT have 2 LG or LG as last Im cool with.

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:27 pm

cowgirl_bebop wrote:LR LG LR RC LR

Really, anything that does NOT have 2 LG or LG as last Im cool with.

I think 2 RC would KILL me.

KylieMorrison
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:22 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby KylieMorrison » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:29 pm

I got the sequence I wanted. It was a relief!
LR LG RC LR LG

User avatar
northwood
Posts: 4872
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby northwood » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:45 pm

im pretty happy with LR RC RC LR LG

im not happy with not being able to seperate how i did on each rc passage in terms of good or bad ( I think RC #1 was my best- so thats probably going to be the exp)

i liked having a break from RC to LR... it helped shift my mental gears from passage to paragraph attack

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby incompetentia » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:43 pm

LG LR LR LG RC for me. I got pretty much the exact opposite but I think I did okay anyway

nickbentley
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:21 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby nickbentley » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:46 pm

tazmolover wrote:
cowgirl_bebop wrote:LR LG LR RC LR

Really, anything that does NOT have 2 LG or LG as last Im cool with.

I think 2 RC would KILL me.


Yep, it was the one order I didn't want.


Got it today and gonmurdered

User avatar
beidoun
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:27 am

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby beidoun » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:51 pm

KylieMorrison wrote:I got the sequence I wanted. It was a relief!
LR LG RC LR LG


Got that sequence as well. Would of loved LG LR RC LG LR.

User avatar
KevinP
Posts: 1324
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby KevinP » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:52 pm

LG LG LG LG LG

Except this test's LG.

User avatar
incompetentia
Posts: 2307
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:57 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby incompetentia » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:05 pm

KevinP wrote:LG LG LG LG LG

Except this test's LG.

180 on a -1 curve? I THINK SO

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:10 pm

incompetentia wrote:
KevinP wrote:LG LG LG LG LG

Except this test's LG.

180 on a -1 curve? I THINK SO


Umm...

5 section LG might be easier to get 180 on even if the curve was something like a -3 = 170 lol.

reversEngineer
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:57 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby reversEngineer » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:14 pm

LR LR LR LR LR

In reality.... LR LR RC LG LR, with the final section being experimental, of course.

User avatar
2014
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby 2014 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:21 pm

RC LG LR LG LR

User avatar
dcman06
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:08 pm

Re: Your Optimal Section Sequence?

Postby dcman06 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:33 pm

LR LG RC LR LG




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: galeatus and 2 guests