.

[jd20132013]

.

[3|ink]

I felt like they were easier than the games from PT 57.

[tazmolover]

I felt the rules on game 4 were prone to being misread.

[bartleby]

I'm pissed because I thought they were easy. Got bogged down on the first game. Misread a question about the driving game. And missed an inference (whether it was needed or not) on the last game that made me run out of time. Had to guess on two questions.

[jd20132013]

.

[JurisDoctorate]

I ordered my games, in terms of perceived difficulty. I think I did 3, 4, 1, 2. I'm not the best on all of the names of the types of games but the one I thought would be the easiest took me forever.

I think there was a game about drivers, some easy game I was able to make a tree for and I don't remember the other two. The one that tripped me up, I think, only had a couple of rules.

I know people are saying they destroyed them but this was the worst LG section I've had in quite some time.

[cowgirl_bebop]

For some reason the one about cars and drivers was throwing me for a loop, so I had to guess on 2-3 after eliminating 2-3 ACs. 2 werent bad, but whatever the really long one (the 4th game?) took me a while. I think I may have done better than I think though, because I started making some vital deductions at the LAST possible moment.

But the best I have ever done on LG is a -3, so Im not expecting much. The other sections are going to have to make my score

[jd20132013]

/

[enigma09]

Yes. I don't know why, but I panicked and ended up guessing on like 7 questions because I couldn't make inferences. I was trying to do hypotheticals for the problems and answering them that way was taking way too long. I'm considering canceling because I was expecting to do no worse than -2 on LG.

[bjc314]

I thought they were fairly easier than what I had done on my lost few practice tests, 56-59, which means either I completely owned them or completely fucked up (but nothing in between)

[jd20132013]

.

[lostone]

rule substitution...pm?

[incompetentia]

I consider games much easier than the other sections but I thought this group was especially simple. Nurses and the jewelry age ones are the only subjects I remember...

I thought the nurse one was somewhat difficult, but it was just in the wording of the rules in my opinion. I figured it was only my problem...guess not.

[Ragged]

I finished it on time and didn't really have to guess, but I felt that its possible I missed some of the inferences and made wrong inferences for some of them or overlooked some of the hypos. I wouldn't say they were extra hard, if anything they were moderate.

[jd20132013]

.

[Gandalf205]

Moderate difficulty. Runners seemed simple.

[ryleez]

hey... need help estimating score for games...were there a lot of d's? I guessed a lot of d's

[jd20132013]

f

[JacobH]

I don't even remember nurses. I left the cars one until the end.

[tazmolover]

Can anyone give me the order of the games?

I don't even remember the details. I just remember if they were sequencing strick/loose or matching or in/out etc...

[Lasers]

all i know is i had to guess on 4 questions of game 4 because i ran out of time...don't even know if the others one i filled out were all right (though i felt ok with the first 3).

[Eric475]

I'm not very good at logic games but i thought this one wasn't too bad....i messed up on the 4th game (slightly misinterpreted a rule) that i hope will only cost me a question or two. I caught the small error at the end but didnt have time to go back through

[YCrevolution]

..

[emseeaych]

Yes, I thought they were extra hard. It's possible it was just nerves, though; LG is my weakest section.

[GQnegro]

I think the games in order were: Cars, Jewelry, Runners and Nurses