LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

User avatar
patrickj11288
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:07 pm

LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby patrickj11288 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:10 pm

Did absolutely horrible on the logic games..... Also did pretty bad on the LR section... Hoping that its the experimental section. Does anyone have any insight?

dingoesatmybaby
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:59 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby dingoesatmybaby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:12 pm

i had:

Section 1: LR (25 questions)
Section 2: LR (25 questions)
Section 3: RC

Section 4: LR (26 questions)
Section 5: LG (Runners, Drivers, Artifacts, Nurses)

I am also trying to figure out which of the LR sections was experimental. However, I can't for the life of me seem to remember any questions being a part of a specific section-- its all a blur :/

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:13 pm

I had the same order as this.

I bombed the first LR section...

User avatar
patrickj11288
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby patrickj11288 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:15 pm

yea i did really bad on the first LR section but again i blacked out during that section so i cant remember a specific question......

lieg
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:50 am

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby lieg » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:16 pm

WARNING: too close. Do it again and be banned.

ppppp
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby ppppp » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:17 pm

i had the same section ordering.

lr 1 had the antibiotic analogy question

lr 2 had the question about drinking/alcohol causing premature death


i think LR 1 was real and LR 2 was experimental...but i hope its the reverse.

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:17 pm

LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

I bombed the first LR section.

I remember some question on the 2nd LR I'm hoping it's not experimental.

Did anyone have any LR section that had a question about car theft and higher probability of getting arrested?

It also had questions about Kafka+burning his unpublished works and some question about Epicurus. Also another question about setting a max temperature on a stove...

Can anyone confirm if this section was real or experimental?

User avatar
patrickj11288
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby patrickj11288 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:18 pm

I had the same feeling.... I wish i knew because if the first was not the experimental id seriously contemplate cancelling...... RC wasnt bad and the third LR with 26 questions wasnt bad but i screwed up LG

dingoesatmybaby
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:59 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby dingoesatmybaby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:19 pm

Yeah, I bombed on Section 1 as well. I had to guess on the last 3 and still had another 3 or 4 from earlier that I had skipped and intended to come back to. At least 6 flat out guesses in that section. REALLY hoping that was experimental.

I wish I could remember specific questions and what was on each section as that would help tremendously in determining which was experimental. Unfortunately it all blends together.

I do remember my section 2 had an Evaluate the Argument question in the first 10. And that was the only section I had that included that question type. Does anyone who only had two LR's remember that question?

morgan34
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:16 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby morgan34 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:20 pm

LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

first was exp.

User avatar
patrickj11288
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby patrickj11288 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:22 pm

morgan34 wrote:LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

first was exp.



Thats what im prayin for morgan.... Do you know for sure?

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:22 pm

morgan34 wrote:LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

first was exp.


Someone in another thread confirmed the 2nd was experimental (at least on the test I had)...

ppppp
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby ppppp » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:26 pm

Rate the games section: easy/med/dif

cars: med

runners: easy

artifacts: med

nurses: med/dif

User avatar
patrickj11288
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby patrickj11288 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:34 pm

more specifically:

LR 1: 25 q's (Hoping its experimental... just seemed hard for some reason and i didnt finish.) (Cany remember specifics but it sucked)
LR 2: 25 q's (Wasnt too bad... Finished with some extra time.) (Something about owl masks i think)
RC 1: 27 q's (Also didnt seem too bad, was generally interested in the topics so that made it easier) (UN, Art Forgery, Black historians)
LR 3: 26 q's (Also wasnt too bad.... This was definately one of the scored ones. Ran out of time on the last question, but had it narrowed down so I made an educated guess.) (Cant remember specifics)
LG 1: (Fucked this bad boy up big time.... Was tired and choked, finished way less of it then normally on PT's.) (Nurses, Vans, cant remember the rest)

User avatar
patrickj11288
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby patrickj11288 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:37 pm

patrickj11288 wrote:more specifically:

LR 1: 25 q's (Hoping its experimental... just seemed hard for some reason and i didnt finish.) (Cany remember specifics but it sucked)
LR 2: 25 q's (Wasnt too bad... Finished with some extra time.) (Something about owl masks i think)
RC 1: 27 q's (Also didnt seem too bad, was generally interested in the topics so that made it easier) (UN, Art Forgery, Black historians)
LR 3: 26 q's (Also wasnt too bad.... This was definately one of the scored ones. Ran out of time on the last question, but had it narrowed down so I made an educated guess.) (Cant remember specifics)
LG 1: (Fucked this bad boy up big time.... Was tired and choked, finished way less of it then normally on PT's.) (Nurses, Vans, cant remember the rest)


LR 3: Had that hiring question that everyone bitched about
LG 1: 23 q's

eads
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:39 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby eads » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:38 pm

ppppp wrote:i had the same section ordering.

lr 1 had the antibiotic analogy question

lr 2 had the question about drinking/alcohol causing premature death


i think LR 1 was real and LR 2 was experimental...but i hope its the reverse.


You are probably right...Cooking analogy is my 3rd LR....my 2nd LR had the alcohol at the first q

shinyusername
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:01 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby shinyusername » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:40 pm

Anyone remember LR 3 having Trinidadian guppies/mating?

tazmolover
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby tazmolover » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:41 pm

shinyusername wrote:Anyone remember LR 3 having Trinidadian guppies/mating?

I had A section with guppies mating. I'm not sure which one it was...

pattymac
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:44 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby pattymac » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:42 pm

i'm hoping guppies mating was real. that was the one about spots right?

shinyusername
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:01 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby shinyusername » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:44 pm

Yep, the spots. I was hoping that section was exp despite most people saying LR 1 or 2, which I thought were easier. Blahhhhhhh to it all

User avatar
patrickj11288
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:07 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby patrickj11288 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:06 pm

which LR section 1-2-4 had the billion year old worms fossil question?

dingoesatmybaby
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:59 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby dingoesatmybaby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:24 pm

I wish I could remember. My brain is mush. I want to say 1 or 2...

dingoesatmybaby
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:59 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby dingoesatmybaby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:52 pm

Soo.. looks like nobody can figure out what the experimental was for this distribution?

it seems to be agreed upon that for the 1st distribution: RC LR LR LG LR , Section 2 (LR 1) is the experimental. Section 3 (LR 2) was real.

For the 2nd distribution: LR LR RC LR LG, its a little different because Sections 1 and 2 are both 25 questions, so either of those sections could have been the "Section 3/ LR 2 section" of 25 questions that is the real section in the first distribution.

I wonder if we will ever figure this out.

pattymac
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:44 pm

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby pattymac » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:54 pm

man I hope so. I had SO much trouble on the 1st LR. Like nothing I was reading registered in my head.

Once the second section came, it was like night and day. I honestly felt like the second LR was one of my best sections to date. I was so rattled after LR1 that I almost walked out, no joke. LR1 just seemed SOOO weird.

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: LR-LR-RC-LR-LG

Postby bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:57 pm

I think guppies and mating and dying was definitely experimental. I had RC LR LR LG LR, and I think that was my first LR, which would've been experimental according to everyone else. Hope this helps.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: batlaw, BobBoblaw, dontsaywhatyoumean, Lahtso Nuggin, PantoroB, xn3345 and 18 guests