RC LR LR LG LR Forum

[bartleby]

adj;lkajda

[pattymac]

saying the same prayer ^

and thats all i remember, that question was FUCKED up. I remember thinking at the break...I've seen 1500 LR questions, maybe 200 PR and none of them have started with that...the whole section seemed soooo weirdo.

[Pitcher]

I also had those questions in second LR (third section) very different.

[kom25]

lolo10: do you remember how many questions your first lr section had?

[JDeterminedF]

lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5

[JDeterminedF]

lolo10: do you remember how many questions your first lr section had?

each had 25 except the last with 26 if i recall correctly...

[RPK34]

lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5

Well those two were the real ones.

And yes, one of the real sections was very strange. There was a parallel reasoning where all the answer choices started with "by this reasoning" and a weird question about identifying parts of an analogy.

[JDeterminedF]

lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5

Well those two were the real ones.

And yes, one of the real sections was very strange. There was a parallel reasoning where all the answer choices started with "by this reasoning" and a weird question about identifying parts of an analogy.

ur killing me man!!!

[bartleby]

wait, there were two LR sections with 26? um...i don't seem to remember this. i know my section 5 had 26 and it was real...

[alphagamma]

lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5

Well those two were the real ones.

And yes, one of the real sections was very strange. There was a parallel reasoning where all the answer choices started with "by this reasoning" and a weird question about identifying parts of an analogy.

Man, that question was confusing! Was that in the experimental? I can't even remember which section it was in. Everything's starting to blur together... @_@

[mattjs64]

lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5

Well those two were the real ones.

And yes, one of the real sections was very strange. There was a parallel reasoning where all the answer choices started with "by this reasoning" and a weird question about identifying parts of an analogy.

Are you positive on that? How do you know?

[cyxdev17]

"By this reasoning" was in section 4 for me. Section 5 (LR) had the rule of law one. My section 2 was an easy LR section (IMO)..unfortunately I don't remember a single question.

...so which one was experimental? I'm reading conflicting reports.

[kom25]

remember anymore questions from section 3 (that you believe to be real)?

[crysmissmichelle]

I had this same pattern (RC LR LR LG LR)


First LR 26 questions
Second LR 25 questions
Third LR 26 questions

Having one of the 26 question ones be experimental would make it 101 questions.

[Pitcher]

RC
LR appeared normal
LR did not appear normal
LG
LR auto theft, herbal medicine, dogs in nursing homes

[bartleby]

Oh wow, so two LR sections had 26 questions if you had 3 LR sections?

Damn it. I am so pissed right now. I had RC LR LR LG LR and bombed Sec. 3 and killed Sec. 2. This is like a double whammy.

In Sec. 3 (the real section), does anyone remember anything about worm fossils and billions of years?

[grover23]

were there 101 questions on the test? or 102?

[peter844]

For the people that had two LG sections, did your LR sections have a question with EKG

[JDeterminedF]

Oh wow, so two LR sections had 26 questions if you had 3 LR sections?

Damn it. I am so pissed right now. I had RC LR LR LG LR and bombed Sec. 3 and killed Sec. 2. This is like a double whammy.

In Sec. 3 (the real section), does anyone remember anything about worm fossils and billions of years?

yes damn that question sucked, lmfao. but HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS WAS THE REAL SECTION???

[Pitcher]

A two section LR test taker recalled Auto theft in LR, so I believe 5 on my test while hard, was real.

[sjlawand88]

I had:

RC RC LR LG LR

The first RC (section 1) was definitely experimental.....

[grover23]

does anyone know if section 2 or 3 of the RC LR LR LG LR format was experimental?

[eads]

Oh wow, so two LR sections had 26 questions if you had 3 LR sections?

Damn it. I am so pissed right now. I had RC LR LR LG LR and bombed Sec. 3 and killed Sec. 2. This is like a double whammy.

In Sec. 3 (the real section), does anyone remember anything about worm fossils and billions of years?

yes damn that question sucked, lmfao. but HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS WAS THE REAL SECTION???

I think some folks claimed they had only two LRs and remembered the worm...

[peter844]

The RC section blew the real one had comparative passages about the way people think relative to instinctive animal thought or something like that

[Sinra]

Oh wow, so two LR sections had 26 questions if you had 3 LR sections?

Damn it. I am so pissed right now. I had RC LR LR LG LR and bombed Sec. 3 and killed Sec. 2. This is like a double whammy.

In Sec. 3 (the real section), does anyone remember anything about worm fossils and billions of years?

yes damn that question sucked, lmfao. but HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS WAS THE REAL SECTION???

I had two LGs and that was definitely real. I had it.