RC LR LR LG LR

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:32 pm

adj;lkajda
Last edited by bartleby on Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

pattymac
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:44 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby pattymac » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:34 pm

saying the same prayer ^

and thats all i remember, that question was FUCKED up. I remember thinking at the break...I've seen 1500 LR questions, maybe 200 PR and none of them have started with that...the whole section seemed soooo weirdo.

User avatar
Pitcher
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:44 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Pitcher » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:36 pm

I also had those questions in second LR (third section) very different.

kom25
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:09 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby kom25 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:38 pm

lolo10: do you remember how many questions your first lr section had?

User avatar
JDeterminedF
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:53 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby JDeterminedF » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:39 pm

lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5 :shock:

User avatar
JDeterminedF
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:53 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby JDeterminedF » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:40 pm

kom25 wrote:lolo10: do you remember how many questions your first lr section had?


each had 25 except the last with 26 if i recall correctly...

RPK34
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby RPK34 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:41 pm

JDeterminedF wrote:lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5 :shock:


Well those two were the real ones.

And yes, one of the real sections was very strange. There was a parallel reasoning where all the answer choices started with "by this reasoning" and a weird question about identifying parts of an analogy.

User avatar
JDeterminedF
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:53 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby JDeterminedF » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:45 pm

RPK34 wrote:
JDeterminedF wrote:lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5 :shock:


Well those two were the real ones.

And yes, one of the real sections was very strange. There was a parallel reasoning where all the answer choices started with "by this reasoning" and a weird question about identifying parts of an analogy.


ur killing me man!!!

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:46 pm

wait, there were two LR sections with 26? um...i don't seem to remember this. i know my section 5 had 26 and it was real...

User avatar
alphagamma
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby alphagamma » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:47 pm

RPK34 wrote:
JDeterminedF wrote:lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5 :shock:


Well those two were the real ones.

And yes, one of the real sections was very strange. There was a parallel reasoning where all the answer choices started with "by this reasoning" and a weird question about identifying parts of an analogy.

Man, that question was confusing! Was that in the experimental? I can't even remember which section it was in. Everything's starting to blur together... @_@

mattjs64
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:58 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby mattjs64 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:49 pm

RPK34 wrote:
JDeterminedF wrote:lol, i love TLS! i had this format. I found the first LR actually easy.. it was sec 3 & 5 that killed me... especially 5 :shock:


Well those two were the real ones.

And yes, one of the real sections was very strange. There was a parallel reasoning where all the answer choices started with "by this reasoning" and a weird question about identifying parts of an analogy.


Are you positive on that? How do you know?

cyxdev17
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:53 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby cyxdev17 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:51 pm

"By this reasoning" was in section 4 for me. Section 5 (LR) had the rule of law one. My section 2 was an easy LR section (IMO)..unfortunately I don't remember a single question.

...so which one was experimental? I'm reading conflicting reports.

kom25
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:09 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby kom25 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:52 pm

remember anymore questions from section 3 (that you believe to be real)?

User avatar
crysmissmichelle
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:39 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby crysmissmichelle » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:53 pm

I had this same pattern (RC LR LR LG LR)


First LR 26 questions
Second LR 25 questions
Third LR 26 questions

Having one of the 26 question ones be experimental would make it 101 questions.

User avatar
Pitcher
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:44 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Pitcher » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:57 pm

RC
LR appeared normal
LR did not appear normal
LG
LR auto theft, herbal medicine, dogs in nursing homes

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:00 pm

Oh wow, so two LR sections had 26 questions if you had 3 LR sections?

Damn it. I am so pissed right now. I had RC LR LR LG LR and bombed Sec. 3 and killed Sec. 2. This is like a double whammy.

In Sec. 3 (the real section), does anyone remember anything about worm fossils and billions of years?

grover23
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:31 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby grover23 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:01 pm

were there 101 questions on the test? or 102?

peter844
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:35 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby peter844 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:02 pm

For the people that had two LG sections, did your LR sections have a question with EKG

User avatar
JDeterminedF
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:53 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby JDeterminedF » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:04 pm

bartleby wrote:Oh wow, so two LR sections had 26 questions if you had 3 LR sections?

Damn it. I am so pissed right now. I had RC LR LR LG LR and bombed Sec. 3 and killed Sec. 2. This is like a double whammy.

In Sec. 3 (the real section), does anyone remember anything about worm fossils and billions of years?


yes :? damn that question sucked, lmfao. but HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS WAS THE REAL SECTION???

User avatar
Pitcher
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:44 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Pitcher » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:06 pm

A two section LR test taker recalled Auto theft in LR, so I believe 5 on my test while hard, was real.

sjlawand88
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:33 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby sjlawand88 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:06 pm

I had:

RC RC LR LG LR

The first RC (section 1) was definitely experimental.....

grover23
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:31 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby grover23 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:08 pm

does anyone know if section 2 or 3 of the RC LR LR LG LR format was experimental?

eads
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:39 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby eads » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:09 pm

JDeterminedF wrote:
bartleby wrote:Oh wow, so two LR sections had 26 questions if you had 3 LR sections?

Damn it. I am so pissed right now. I had RC LR LR LG LR and bombed Sec. 3 and killed Sec. 2. This is like a double whammy.

In Sec. 3 (the real section), does anyone remember anything about worm fossils and billions of years?


yes :? damn that question sucked, lmfao. but HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS WAS THE REAL SECTION???


I think some folks claimed they had only two LRs and remembered the worm...

peter844
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:35 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby peter844 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:11 pm

The RC section blew the real one had comparative passages about the way people think relative to instinctive animal thought or something like that

User avatar
Sinra
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:15 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Sinra » Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:12 pm

JDeterminedF wrote:
bartleby wrote:Oh wow, so two LR sections had 26 questions if you had 3 LR sections?

Damn it. I am so pissed right now. I had RC LR LR LG LR and bombed Sec. 3 and killed Sec. 2. This is like a double whammy.

In Sec. 3 (the real section), does anyone remember anything about worm fossils and billions of years?


yes :? damn that question sucked, lmfao. but HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS WAS THE REAL SECTION???



I had two LGs and that was definitely real. I had it.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests