RC LR LR LG LR

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar
JDHopeful

Bronze
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:20 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby JDHopeful » Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:09 am

I had this distribution, except it went RC, LR (25 Q’s), LR (25 Q’s), LG, and LR (26 Q’s)!

Thoughts??

User avatar
Gemini

Gold
Posts: 1945
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Gemini » Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:23 pm

JDHopeful wrote:I had this distribution, except it went RC, LR (25 Q’s), LR (25 Q’s), LG, and LR (26 Q’s)!

Thoughts??


Hello fellow Hopeful!

Your 1st LR was the experimental.

Sandro

Gold
Posts: 2526
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Sandro » Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:56 pm

Gemini Hopeful wrote:
JDHopeful wrote:I had this distribution, except it went RC, LR (25 Q’s), LR (25 Q’s), LG, and LR (26 Q’s)!

Thoughts??


Hello fellow Hopeful!

Your 1st LR was the experimental.


I hope so. 1st LR was definitely harder than any of the 3 IMO

lolol10

Bronze
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:39 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby lolol10 » Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:57 pm

Sandro777 wrote:
Gemini Hopeful wrote:
JDHopeful wrote:I had this distribution, except it went RC, LR (25 Q’s), LR (25 Q’s), LG, and LR (26 Q’s)!

Thoughts??


Hello fellow Hopeful!

Your 1st LR was the experimental.


I hope so. 1st LR was definitely harder than any of the 3 IMO

+1 i blacked-out the experience. horrible way to start the exam. everything else felt A LOT easier after that though

User avatar
Gemini

Gold
Posts: 1945
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Gemini » Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:13 pm

uclacurry wrote:I had

RC (27) LR (26) LR (25) LG (23) LR (26)

Which one was experimental?


I had the exact same distribution as you.

The current theory is that the second section, no matter what it is, is the experimental section.

lsatnyc83

New
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:11 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby lsatnyc83 » Wed Oct 13, 2010 8:48 pm

i had RC LR (25) LR (25) LG LR (26)

any chance the third section was experimental? has anyone confirmed this possibility?

Sandro

Gold
Posts: 2526
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Sandro » Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:04 pm

I had the same. I hope it was the first LR that was experimental.

bartleby

Silver
Posts: 1314
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby bartleby » Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:19 pm

For those who had two 25Q LR before break, I thought we all agreed the 2nd one was much harder? Bah, I don't even remember now but one LR was easy as shit and I heard that one was the experimental.

User avatar
JDHopeful

Bronze
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:20 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby JDHopeful » Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:54 pm

Yea, but isnt it tru that they may have flipped them?

minnbills

Gold
Posts: 3305
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby minnbills » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:05 pm

JDHopeful wrote:Yea, but isnt it tru that they may have flipped them?


It's definitely possible that there were multilple experimentals deployed on the RC LR LR LG LR format.

At this point, I don't think were going to know 'til the scores come out.

Sandro

Gold
Posts: 2526
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Sandro » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:37 pm

bartleby wrote:For those who had two 25Q LR before break, I thought we all agreed the 2nd one was much harder? Bah, I don't even remember now but one LR was easy as shit and I heard that one was the experimental.


I thought the first one was experimental. To be honest i cant exactly remember how many questions I had on each LR but Im pretty sure my first LR was 25. Second LR was much easier than first.

User avatar
DrackedaryMaster

Bronze
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:11 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby DrackedaryMaster » Wed Oct 13, 2010 10:45 pm

The first LR (Kafka, Some Greek Apprentice Q, etc) was unfortunately experiemental and was probably the easiest LR for me since my one and only -0 on LR2 of PT57. I finished 5 minutes early, had time to check my answers and was unsure of only 2 questions max. Everything else looked like a gimmie. I have to think that whatever future test this thing lands on must be coupled with a killer LG or RC section, because this LR was way, way, easy. It sucked, because going into Section 3, I thought I was right on target for my raw score of 82-85, only to find out in Section 5 that it was not to be.

Unfortunately, the other LRs sucked. I average -10/-12 and that looks like where I wound up again. Now crossing my fingers hoping that LG didn't screw me over entirely from hitting 160 since I had to guess on quite a few in the last game due to time pressure.

Sandro

Gold
Posts: 2526
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:12 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Sandro » Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:18 pm

DrackedaryMaster wrote:The first LR (Kafka, Some Greek Apprentice Q, etc) was unfortunately experiemental and was probably the easiest LR for me since my one and only -0 on LR2 of PT57. I finished 5 minutes early, had time to check my answers and was unsure of only 2 questions max. Everything else looked like a gimmie. I have to think that whatever future test this thing lands on must be coupled with a killer LG or RC section, because this LR was way, way, easy. It sucked, because going into Section 3, I thought I was right on target for my raw score of 82-85, only to find out in Section 5 that it was not to be.

Unfortunately, the other LRs sucked. I average -10/-12 and that looks like where I wound up again. Now crossing my fingers hoping that LG didn't screw me over entirely from hitting 160 since I had to guess on quite a few in the last game due to time pressure.


I had 3 LR and dont for the life of me remember Kafka. I also thought LR1 was hardest so it seems there are multiple arrangements of LR.

User avatar
Perch

Silver
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:36 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Perch » Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:02 am

RPK34 wrote:
JamesDean44 wrote:FML. Nailed the second section (first LR) which apparently means nada.


Me too. Experimental was a joke.


definitely felt better about section 2 than section 3 or 5

User avatar
Lasers

Gold
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Thu Oct 14, 2010 7:01 pm

did anyone else have this exact order:

1: RC-27
2: LR-25
3: LR-26
4: LG-23
5: LR-26

???

lolol10

Bronze
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 2:39 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby lolol10 » Thu Oct 14, 2010 7:03 pm

yeah but i had the two RC before break flipped. 26 25

User avatar
Lasers

Gold
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Thu Oct 14, 2010 7:05 pm

lolol10 wrote:yeah but i had the two RC before break flipped. 26 25

almost everyone i have seen had what you had.

i'm wondering if anyone else had it 25 then 26 like i did or am i just misremembering...!? :x

User avatar
alphagamma

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby alphagamma » Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:40 pm

Sandro777 wrote:
DrackedaryMaster wrote:The first LR (Kafka, Some Greek Apprentice Q, etc) was unfortunately experiemental and was probably the easiest LR for me since my one and only -0 on LR2 of PT57. I finished 5 minutes early, had time to check my answers and was unsure of only 2 questions max. Everything else looked like a gimmie. I have to think that whatever future test this thing lands on must be coupled with a killer LG or RC section, because this LR was way, way, easy. It sucked, because going into Section 3, I thought I was right on target for my raw score of 82-85, only to find out in Section 5 that it was not to be.

Unfortunately, the other LRs sucked. I average -10/-12 and that looks like where I wound up again. Now crossing my fingers hoping that LG didn't screw me over entirely from hitting 160 since I had to guess on quite a few in the last game due to time pressure.


I had 3 LR and dont for the life of me remember Kafka. I also thought LR1 was hardest so it seems there are multiple arrangements of LR.

Yeah, there were multiple experimental LR sections. Mine didn't have Kafka, either. I believe it had a question about spider venom.

User avatar
Perch

Silver
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:36 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Perch » Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:55 pm

alphagamma wrote:
Sandro777 wrote:
DrackedaryMaster wrote:The first LR (Kafka, Some Greek Apprentice Q, etc) was unfortunately experiemental and was probably the easiest LR for me since my one and only -0 on LR2 of PT57. I finished 5 minutes early, had time to check my answers and was unsure of only 2 questions max. Everything else looked like a gimmie. I have to think that whatever future test this thing lands on must be coupled with a killer LG or RC section, because this LR was way, way, easy. It sucked, because going into Section 3, I thought I was right on target for my raw score of 82-85, only to find out in Section 5 that it was not to be.

Unfortunately, the other LRs sucked. I average -10/-12 and that looks like where I wound up again. Now crossing my fingers hoping that LG didn't screw me over entirely from hitting 160 since I had to guess on quite a few in the last game due to time pressure.


I had 3 LR and dont for the life of me remember Kafka. I also thought LR1 was hardest so it seems there are multiple arrangements of LR.

Yeah, there were multiple experimental LR sections. Mine didn't have Kafka, either. I believe it had a question about spider venom.


did the spider venom have to do with some other animal? i can't remember kafka or venom really



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests