RC LR LR LG LR

trayball23
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:34 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby trayball23 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:56 pm

Everyone who wants to know what LR was real if you had 3 the LR after the break had 26 and was real and the one before the break had 25. I know this for a fact my buddy had 26 and 25 as well with only 2 LR sections. Mine went RC,LR25,LR25, LG, LR26. I know that for certain but I dont know which LR before the break was real but i know it was one with 25

hoya7
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby hoya7 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:58 pm

i had LR LG RC LR LG

i'm pretty sure the second section was experimental. some ppl i saw had RC in the second section, and some had LR.

User avatar
alphagamma
Posts: 173
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby alphagamma » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:03 pm

trayball23 wrote:Everyone who wants to know what LR was real if you had 3 the LR after the break had 26 and was real and the one before the break had 25. I know this for a fact my buddy had 26 and 25 as well with only 2 LR sections. Mine went RC,LR25,LR25, LG, LR26. I know that for certain but I dont know which LR before the break was real but i know it was one with 25

The LR section with the question about spider venom was the experimental. I believe it was the first LR section.

trayball23
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:34 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby trayball23 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:07 pm

Spider Venom? can u give me a little more between the crazy football games and lsat I dont remember any venom

originalmutt
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby originalmutt » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:12 pm

I had three LRs, and I do not remember a question about spider venom ... got any more details?

My format was also RC LR LR LG LR ... I absolutely kicked LR1's butt ... actually had time to go back and double check my answers. I'm pretty sure it had 25 questions but I'm not 100 percent. All the questions seem to blur together at this point.

I did not do as well on LR2 and LR3

ND'10
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:46 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby ND'10 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:15 pm

My test was also

CR 27
LR 25 (featured questions about pottery 18, and cro-magnons 19)
LR 25 (started with a question about potato plants)
LG 23
LR 26 (strangers, law at 25, long PTR at 26)

Can somebody say if Sec 2 or Sec 3 was the experimental?

originalmutt
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby originalmutt » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:17 pm

ND'10 wrote:My test was also

CR 27
LR 25 (featured qurestions about pottery 18, and cro-magnons 19)
LR 25 (started with a question about potato plants)
LG 23
LR 26 (strangers, law at 25, long PTR at 26)


I don't remember anything about potato plants ... more details? Ditto for pottery and cro-magnons ... then again, my brain is pretty fried right now.

I do remember those questions from the last section.

bartleby
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:23 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby bartleby » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:20 pm

originalmutt wrote:
ND'10 wrote:My test was also

CR 27
LR 25 (featured qurestions about pottery 18, and cro-magnons 19)
LR 25 (started with a question about potato plants)
LG 23
LR 26 (strangers, law at 25, long PTR at 26)


I don't remember anything about potato plants ... more details? Ditto for pottery and cro-magnons ... then again, my brain is pretty fried right now.

I do remember those questions from the last section.


I think ND is pulling our virtual legs. Cro Magnons, potato plants, and pottery don't ring a bell at all.

ND'10
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:46 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby ND'10 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:20 pm

edit
Last edited by ND'10 on Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Intimate
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:49 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Intimate » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:21 pm

If you guys wanna discuss this topic in an AIM chatroom - join the chat room "TLSOctDiscussion"

trayball23
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:34 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby trayball23 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:22 pm

Nd is on the right track I had all those questions. If someone who did not have 3 LR could confirm i could finally take a dam nap. Hey ND'10 nice win today.

ND'10
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:46 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby ND'10 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:23 pm

edit
Last edited by ND'10 on Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sinra
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:15 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Sinra » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:25 pm


I don't think any of this is breaking the rules because I'm not discussing answers or I'll edit, please dont ban me



Wrong.

ND'10
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:46 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby ND'10 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:25 pm

trayball23 wrote:Nd is on the right track I had all those questions. If someone who did not have 3 LR could confirm i could finally take a dam nap. Hey ND'10 nice win today.


Phew, thanks I was starting to think I somehow had 2 experimental LRs and they screwed up my test hahah

Yeah, big win to get back to .500. First year post-graduation, its killing me not to be at all the games

User avatar
Gemini
Posts: 1943
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Gemini » Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:49 pm

I'm 100% sure I had 27, 26, 25, 23, 26.

doodoo7733
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:27 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby doodoo7733 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:57 pm

Just clarifying...the RC,LR,LR,LG,LR test. The second LR (section 3), with the antibody, cooking, herbal remedy analogy was real and the LR (section 2) before that was experimental? If so, thats stupid....Section 3 felt so different!

User avatar
Gemini
Posts: 1943
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Gemini » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:01 pm

doodoo7733 wrote:Just clarifying...the RC,LR,LR,LG,LR test. The second LR (section 3), with the antibody, cooking, herbal remedy analogy was real and the LR (section 2) before that was experimental? If so, thats stupid....Section 3 felt so different!


The antibody herbal remedy was from section 5 and was unfortunately real.

Aggiegrad2011
Posts: 1514
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Aggiegrad2011 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:13 pm

Yeah that last LR killed me.

So... December LSAT or apply early next year after the June LSAT and waste a year doing... something?

User avatar
crysmissmichelle
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:39 am

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby crysmissmichelle » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:43 pm

It actually makes perfect sense for there to be two experimental LR sections on the test and for them to be random order. . .I mean, they are testing for the future and we know that they need two different LR sections for each test. . . and I don't remember any of those questions the 25/25/26 guy is quoting because I am 110% sure I had 26/25/26.

User avatar
Lasers
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:33 pm

crysmissmichelle wrote:It actually makes perfect sense for there to be two experimental LR sections on the test and for them to be random order. . .I mean, they are testing for the future and we know that they need two different LR sections for each test. . . and I don't remember any of those questions the 25/25/26 guy is quoting because I am 110% sure I had 26/25/26.

i had 25/26/26, but i think our passages were probably the same, just in a different order.

does that mean the 26 question section in the first three was the experimental?

User avatar
Lasers
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Lasers » Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:36 pm

Aggiegrad2011 wrote:Yeah that last LR killed me.

So... December LSAT or apply early next year after the June LSAT and waste a year doing... something?

yeah, i usually finish the LR but i actually had to guess on one cause i didn't have time to do it. the last LR felt difficult.

User avatar
jonillson
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:14 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby jonillson » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:47 pm

RC LR LR LG LR

unfortunately, I don't remember the number of questions on each section

but i do remember that the last question in section 3 (LR #2) revolved around university presidents (not budgets).

do we know if this section was scored? section 2 (LR #1) was an absolute bear; i don't even recall finishing, and i am fairly strong on LR.

am hoping section 2 (LR #1) was the experimental, which seems to be the consensus on the board.

is it possible there were two tests with the layout RC LR LR LG LR?

User avatar
Gemini
Posts: 1943
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby Gemini » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:49 pm

jonillson wrote:RC LR LR LG LR

unfortunately, I don't remember the number of questions on each section

but i do remember that the last question in section 3 (LR #2) revolved around university presidents (not budgets).

do we know if this section was scored? section 2 (LR #1) was an absolute bear; i don't even recall finishing, and i am fairly strong on LR.

am hoping section 2 (LR #1) was the experimental, which seems to be the consensus on the board.

is it possible there were two tests with the layout RC LR LR LG LR?


I believe there is. People are reporting a 27/26/25/23/26 section distribution.
Others are reporting 27/25/25/23/26.

lsatnyc83
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:11 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby lsatnyc83 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 5:57 pm

I believe there is. People are reporting a 27/26/25/23/26 section distribution.
Others are reporting 27/25/25/23/26.[/quote]

Is it possible that there was one 27 25(E) 25 23 26 test and one 27 25 25(E) 23 26 test or are there usually not that many variations?

originalmutt
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: RC LR LR LG LR

Postby originalmutt » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:56 pm

I think it's very possible that sections 2 and 3 are flipped in some versions of rc lr lr lg lr

I've given up trying to figure out which one was experimental. I can't remember which questions were on which section and it doesn't seem like that many others do either




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], cianchetta0, dontsaywhatyoumean, DumbHollywoodActor and 11 guests